價格以新臺幣顯示。

搜尋田納西州飛往台灣的便宜機票

來回
經濟艙
華盛頓 (WAS)
台灣
12月18日 週三
12月25日 週三
任何月份
比較KAYAK和 |
同時搜尋數百家旅遊網站,為你尋找飛往台灣的機票優惠

田納西州往台灣航班資訊

航班降落地點 台灣
航班出發地點 田納西州
機票價格 NT$ 22,107
航空公司 美國聯合航空, 日本航空, 達美航空

預訂田納西州飛往台灣機票的常見問題

KAYAK如何找到這麼便宜的機票價格?
KAYAK每年處理超過20億個旅遊搜尋,並顯示從數百個航空公司和第三方網站上所得的價格,讓你一次比較機票價格和選項。它同時亦顯示超過二百萬家飯店,還有租車、假期套票、活動等搜尋結果,以及數百萬個獲驗證的評價,讓用戶查看最多的旅遊選項。
KAYAK組合如何幫助我省錢?
KAYAK組合讓你結合不同航空公司的單程機票,因爲這樣比購買來回機票更便宜。
KAYAK所搜尋的機票供應商是否比同行競爭者多?
對,相比網上旅行社,KAYAK取得的數據和資訊較多,因此在全球各地的準確性亦較佳。
KAYAK的機票價格預測如何幫助我把握預訂的最佳時機?
KAYAK的機票價格預測工具使用歷史數據,以估計指定目的地和日期的價格會否在7天內有所改變,讓旅客知道應該立即預訂,還是等候一下。

預訂田納西州往台灣的便宜機票(來回)

機場
出發地
孟菲斯
NT$ 36,529
僅選
NT$ 36,529
納什維爾
NT$ 22,107
僅選
NT$ 22,107
諾克斯維爾
NT$ 30,584
僅選
NT$ 30,584
目的地
台北
NT$ 27,534
僅選
NT$ 27,534
NT$ 22,107
僅選
NT$ 22,107
1月12日 週日
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
35小時25分鐘
2月4日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
23小時52分鐘
NT$ 22,107
旅程:24天
7.3 顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據66,304篇評論
整體
7.3
登機
7.4
舒適
7.0
機艙服務員
7.7
娛樂
6.6
食品
6.5
IAH
AUS
極好 9.0

優點: We arrives early.

缺點: Very long walk to next gate. No golf carts wanted to bring US. Wife is pregnant

GIG
IAH
尚可 4.6

缺點: On time departure. A comfortable seat.

IAH
AUS
7.3

缺點: My suitcase handle was broken

POS
IAH
7.0

缺點: More space on the flight

SFO
FRA
極好 8.0

優點: Flight departed on time. Good seat pitch in economy. Food and beverages included and tasted good surprisingly. Crew were helpful and efficient. Plenty of entertainment options for film, TV and music.

缺點: Do not like the process of boarding by group number. Another way of squeezing money out of the consumer. Also causes chaos when trying to board. Seats too narrow in economy especially if your broad shouldered.

12月9日 週一
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
39小時20分鐘
1月16日 週四
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
35小時04分鐘
NT$ 27,534
旅程:39天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,372篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.9
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
NRT
ITM
極好 10.0

優點: Simply excellent !!!

CGK
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: Easily upgrade to premium economy class

缺點: Some staff lack of basic english

HKG
HND
7.3

缺點: Some crew members from Hong Kong better make more effort to improve service skills.

NRT
HEL
極好 8.3

優點: The business class layout was very good. Seats comfortable with excellent cabin staff and the food and its presentation was A+

缺點: Hard to think of something here...possibly better movie selection and having to bus from plane to terminal... But that's about it!

NRT
MEL
極好 10.0

優點: Nothing to complaint. Excellent airline nowadays

12月6日 週五
MEM
孟菲斯 Memphis
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
23小時55分鐘
1月15日 週三
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
MEM
孟菲斯 Memphis
32小時11分鐘
NT$ 36,529
旅程:41天
8.1極好 顯示評論
整體8.1 極好
根據27,144篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
7.8
食品
7.5
AMS
MSP
極好 10.0

缺點: I fly regular this was an excellent flight

JFK
IAD
6.0

優點: The flight for getting us therw

缺點: No food and no entertainment

MCI
LAX
尚可 4.8

優點: Crew were ok. Not that comfortable.

缺點: seat need to be more comfortable

JFK
DUB
極好 10.0

優點: Service

缺點: Nothing

RDU
ATL
極好 8.0

優點: Clean Washroom

缺點: N A

1月12日 週日
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
35小時25分鐘
2月4日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
23小時52分鐘
NT$ 22,107
旅程:24天
7.3 顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據66,304篇評論
整體
7.3
登機
7.4
舒適
7.0
機艙服務員
7.7
娛樂
6.6
食品
6.5
SFO
LHR
極好 8.0

缺點: The queues at immigration in San Francisco were disgracefully long. it took us 3 hrs to get to our luggage. Advice to US govt to employ more immigration officers. Airlines should report on this

IAD
BOS
7.0

缺點: It appears united is unable to fly their planes on times, in particular on the East Coast. We were delayed by 90min on each legs

ORD
SFO
一般 2.3

缺點: United Airlines in our experience runs late putting a lot of pressure on any ongoing connections . Not clean . Staff not friendly . Only sometimes helpful.

EWR
MIA
6.6

優點: Nice quick flight staff great and very helpful!

缺點: Entertainment wasn’t free

BOI
SFO
極好 8.6

優點: The crew were friendly & efficient, the flights were on time, & the gate staff kept us well informed of any changes.

12月9日 週一
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
TSA
台北松山
39小時20分鐘
1月16日 週四
TSA
台北松山
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
35小時04分鐘
NT$ 27,534
旅程:39天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,372篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.9
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
NRT
MEL
極好 10.0

優點: Excellent Service, food and beverage. Comfortable aircraft cabin atmosphere.

缺點: in-flight Wifi is not working

NRT
MEL
極好 10.0

優點: Nothing to complaint. Excellent airline nowadays

HND
BKK
一般 2.0

優點: Nothing

缺點: Everything. Screens were small. Leg space was little to none. Food was trrrible. I will never fly with JAL again

NRT
ITM
極好 10.0

優點: Simply excellent !!!

CTS
HND
7.6

優點: Very efficient boarding. Using two doors and a twin aisle plane made boarding very efficient despite the size of the plane and the number of people. Free WiFi worked surprisingly well - I was able to make a video call to my family. The plane was clean and tidy . Not really much more to say as it was a very short flight.

缺點: No food offered, not even a biscuit, only very basic drink selection.

12月9日 週一
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
39小時20分鐘
1月16日 週四
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
35小時04分鐘
NT$ 27,534
旅程:39天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,372篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.9
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
CGK
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: Great service.

HND
BKK
一般 2.0

優點: Nothing

缺點: Everything. Screens were small. Leg space was little to none. Food was trrrible. I will never fly with JAL again

NRT
HKG
尚可 4.6

缺點: Why does the shorter of the two flights have more comfortable seats?

MEL
NRT
極好 8.0

優點: Beautifully presented and tasty Japanese food. Electronic windows.

缺點: Not overly impressed with the 12:05am departure time. Western food not overly impressive. Having to travel from the plane to terminal by bus.

TSA
HND
極好 9.0

優點: Very attentive service, very comfortable seats on economy, good food, excellent attention to detail

12月9日 週一
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
TSA
台北松山
39小時20分鐘
1月16日 週四
TSA
台北松山
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
35小時04分鐘
NT$ 27,534
旅程:39天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,372篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.9
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
KIX
HNL
極好 9.6

優點: The friendliness of the crew and the comfort of the seat + size of the screen

缺點: Possibly more food options could of been better, only had western or Japanese option

JFK
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: The food (Japanese) clearly was a league of its own. Service was prompt, attentive yet discreet.

缺點: Selection of video entertainment could be increased and improved.

KUL
NRT
7.0

優點: The crew were cooperative and the supplies were good

缺點: The chairs were not comfortable and the toilets were so dirty

HND
HKG
極好 8.0

優點: 服務 電影 雪糕

缺點: 飯不好

MEL
SIN
極好 10.0

優點: Food was delicious Staff were friendly Excellent in flight entertainment Nice new plane

缺點: Nothing, it was all good!

3月4日 週三
TYS
諾克斯維爾 McGhee Tyson
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
24小時49分鐘
3月19日 週四
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
TYS
諾克斯維爾 McGhee Tyson
22小時25分鐘
NT$ 30,584
旅程:15天
7.3 顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據66,304篇評論
整體
7.3
登機
7.4
舒適
7.0
機艙服務員
7.7
娛樂
6.6
食品
6.5
LHR
EWR
極好 8.3

優點: Check in was very good Both Outward and Return flights were on time. Crew very attentive Seating not too bad (if you haven't got long legs)

缺點: Food could be a bit more varied - some people don't like pasta and some people don't like chicken - what was left????? Should have different entertainment on different legs of the journey Not really Flight-related but Passport Control in US could do with a review .... waiting a good hour or so - come stations were empty and those that weren't the staff were changing shifts while there was still loads of people to go through - not nice when you have people meeting you.

IAD
BOS
7.0

缺點: It appears united is unable to fly their planes on times, in particular on the East Coast. We were delayed by 90min on each legs

LHR
IAH
極好 8.0

優點: Came close to missing flight because of gate delay because of connecting flight, but one of the flight attendants saw I was flustered and sweaty and gave me a cup of water before the flight even took off. Very thoughtful and nice.

LAX
IAD
尚可 5.6

優點: Cost

缺點: Aircon too cool

EWR
LHR
極好 9.0

優點: Request for supply of earplugs was kindly met. Cabin crew were attentive and friendly. Food was some of the best I have ever eaten in Economy.

缺點: Check-in staff at EWR were abrupt to the point of rudeness. Did not feel valued as a customer.

11月23日 週六
TYS
諾克斯維爾 McGhee Tyson
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
62小時20分鐘
11月27日 週三
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
TYS
諾克斯維爾 McGhee Tyson
26小時49分鐘
NT$ 33,785
旅程:5天
7.3 顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據66,304篇評論
整體
7.3
登機
7.4
舒適
7.0
機艙服務員
7.7
娛樂
6.6
食品
6.5
SFO
FRA
極好 8.0

優點: Flight departed on time. Good seat pitch in economy. Food and beverages included and tasted good surprisingly. Crew were helpful and efficient. Plenty of entertainment options for film, TV and music.

缺點: Do not like the process of boarding by group number. Another way of squeezing money out of the consumer. Also causes chaos when trying to board. Seats too narrow in economy especially if your broad shouldered.

DEN
CVG
6.3

缺點: So it was annoying that the seat that was assigned to me..airline assigned that seat to someone else because that person asked for it. And nobody bothered to ask me( no email or call or anything) even though there were lot of empty seats. But the passenger was polite he moved to his original seat.

LHR
LAX
7.0

優點: Clean modern plane

缺點: Switched to American airways so the booking reference did not work. Had to call them to get a new reference so I could check in. But could not get boarding pass. Food not too good on the flight.

CGK
NRT
尚可 5.3

優點: the flight from JKT to Tokyo to Newark was good, entertainment was good, food was good, crew was good.

缺點: THE flight from Newark to Montreal was HORRIBLE! the flight was delayed and when we boarded, we were stranded on the taxiways for 2,5 hours. After 20 hours of flying, and you know your last flight was just another hour, I ended up arriving Montreal at 12.30 AM when it should've been 9 PM

YYZ
SFO
極好 10.0

優點: The crew were so helpful and nice

缺點: Only if teleportation exists

1月26日 週日
MEM
孟菲斯 Memphis
TSA
台北松山
37小時55分鐘
2月5日 週三
TSA
台北松山
MEM
孟菲斯 Memphis
40小時34分鐘
NT$ 49,915
旅程:11天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,372篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.9
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
JFK
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: The food (Japanese) clearly was a league of its own. Service was prompt, attentive yet discreet.

缺點: Selection of video entertainment could be increased and improved.

SGN
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: even though I was in Economy class, the seat was comfortable, the food was good and the flight attendands were attentive and polite

SYD
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: The service, food, entertainment, everything was perfect. Thanks so much

HND
BKK
一般 2.0

優點: Nothing

缺點: Everything. Screens were small. Leg space was little to none. Food was trrrible. I will never fly with JAL again

HKG
NGO
極好 8.0

優點: Service was good

缺點: The entertainment system was old and very backwards

12月9日 週一
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
TSA
台北松山
24小時40分鐘
1月6日 週一
TSA
台北松山
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
34小時13分鐘
NT$ 65,283
旅程:29天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,372篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.9
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
NRT
HKG
6.6

優點: Cabin crew were very nice. Food was okay, while the legroom was good too.

缺點: Delayed flight, but the email notification from JL was lacking the most important detail... The new take off time! It was 70 minutes later than advertised, but then delayed by another five minutes on top after a late take off.

NRT
SIN
極好 9.3

優點: I got an upgrade!

NGO
HND
7.6

優點: Service and polite staff.

缺點: Not much space between the seats for my long legs.

KIX
HNL
極好 9.6

優點: The friendliness of the crew and the comfort of the seat + size of the screen

缺點: Possibly more food options could of been better, only had western or Japanese option

NRT
SIN
6.0

缺點: Double standard

12月9日 週一
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
TSA
台北松山
24小時40分鐘
1月6日 週一
TSA
台北松山
BNA
納什維爾 Nashville Intl
34小時13分鐘
NT$ 65,283
旅程:29天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,372篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.9
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
JFK
NRT
7.3

優點: - Crew was respectful and nice - Entertainment options were good. - Seats were good and comfortable

缺點: - Food was too less. Being a vegetarian, I had expected good amount of food. But it was only a few ounce of food like just given to taste it. I was hungry most of the time in flight. My second meal didnt even have any bread. And Desert (icecream) was never offered to me. Seriously, if I had known this, I would have packed my own food to board the plane. - The windows should have an option to close the pane. Sun was constantly on the left window (where I was seated) for the entire journey and even after fading the window, it was on my eyes most of the time.

NRT
SYD
7.3

優點: Simple check in and boarding, right on time.

CGK
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: Great service.

HND
NGO
極好 8.0

優點: I slept the whole time so I have no comments about the in flight service

NRT
MEL
極好 10.0

優點: Excellent Service, food and beverage. Comfortable aircraft cabin atmosphere.

缺點: in-flight Wifi is not working

*
價格為包含所有稅項與費用的單人價,僅適用於電子票,而使用貨幣為TWD。

我們致力取得精確價格,但是沒辦法保證價格

原因如下:

我們不是賣家
KAYAK不設定價格,所以不能保證其他公司販賣的產品。

我們負責搜集眾多資料
我們的服務讓你迅速輕鬆同時比較數百家旅遊網站的搜尋結果,所以KAYAK是個搜尋引擎,無法保證找到的價格。

為什麼價格不能總是100%準確?
機位、飯店房間和租車的價格可能經常變動。同一時間內也可能有很多人同時嘗試購買相同的旅程選項。所以,有時候你可能會發現有些標價已經沒有位子了。

有更多疑問或者想跟我們舉報錯誤票價
請給我們寄送 電郵 我們團隊成員將很快跟你聯絡。

1
  • 來回
  • 單程
  • 多程
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
  • 多個艙等
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙