價格以新臺幣顯示。

搜尋前往夏威夷州的平價機票

來回
經濟艙
威奇托 (ICT)
夏威夷州
11月21日 週四
11月28日 週四
任何月份
比較KAYAK和 |
同時搜尋數百家旅遊網站,為你尋找飛往夏威夷州的機票優惠

台灣往夏威夷州航班資訊

航班降落地點 夏威夷州
航班出發地點 台灣
機票價格 NT$ 17,063
航空公司 菲律賓航空, 中華航空, 中國東方航空, 大韓航空, 達美航空, 韓亞航空, 日本航空

最新夏威夷州機票優惠

檀香山
直飛NT$ 19,423.15
直飛NT$ 19,423.15

搜尋飛往夏威夷州便宜機票的小秘訣

想找飛往夏威夷州的便宜機票?25%的用戶找到以下價錢或更便宜的來回機票:台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場出發,NT$ 19,423, 台北出發,NT$ 19,423
想以低於平均價格訂機票,應提前最少1星期預訂。
1月、2月和3月是旅遊旺季。5月飛往夏威夷州的機票最便宜。
將你的首選出發機場和旅遊日期輸入到上方搜尋欄位,開始搜尋最新的夏威夷州機票優惠。

常見問題:預訂夏威夷州機票

飛往夏威夷州要多久?

台灣飛往夏威夷州的直飛航班平均需時14小時14分鐘,飛行距離為8165km。 最熱門的航線是台北往檀香山,平均需時8小時30分鐘。

飛往夏威夷州最便宜的機票多少錢?

過去72小時內找到台灣往夏威夷州最便宜的機票價格是NT$ 17,307。 最熱門的航線是台北往檀香山,過去72小時內找到最便宜的機票價格是NT$ 17,307。

哪些航空公司會飛往夏威夷州?

中華航空及夏威夷航空經常提供夏威夷州往台灣的航班。 最熱門的航線是台北往檀香山,中華航空及夏威夷航空經常提供此路線的航班。

夏威夷州哪些城市最受歡迎?

KAYAK機票搜尋數據顯示最熱門的目的地是檀香山,佔飛往夏威夷州總搜尋量的94%。其他熱門目的地有利胡埃卡胡盧伊,分別佔總搜尋量6%和1%。

KAYAK如何找到這麼便宜的機票價格?

KAYAK每年處理超過20億個旅遊搜尋,並顯示從數百個航空公司和第三方網站上所得的價格,讓你一次比較機票價格和選項。它同時亦顯示超過二百萬家飯店,還有租車、假期套票、活動等搜尋結果,以及數百萬個獲驗證的評價,讓用戶查看最多的旅遊選項。

KAYAK組合如何幫助我省錢?

KAYAK組合讓你結合不同航空公司的單程機票,因爲這樣比購買來回機票更便宜。

KAYAK所搜尋的機票供應商是否比同行競爭者多?

對,相比網上旅行社,KAYAK取得的數據和資訊較多,因此在全球各地的準確性亦較佳。

KAYAK的機票價格預測如何幫助我把握預訂的最佳時機?

KAYAK的機票價格預測工具使用歷史數據,以估計指定目的地和日期的價格會否在7天內有所改變,讓旅客知道應該立即預訂,還是等候一下。

預訂前往夏威夷州的特惠機票

(來回)
機場
出發地
台北
NT$ 30,249
僅選
NT$ 30,249
NT$ 17,063
僅選
NT$ 17,063
目的地
檀香山
NT$ 17,063
僅選
NT$ 17,063
11月21日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
17小時40分鐘
11月26日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
27小時40分鐘
NT$ 17,063
旅程:6天
7.3顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據2,870篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
8.0
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
HKG
MNL
一般 2.0

缺點: Extremely bad experience, the airline rejected to issue boarding pass to us without an appropiate explanation. Never take Phillipine airlines anymore

MNL
CEB
一般 2.0

優點: you ripped me off

缺點: you ripped me off

MNL
MEL
一般 2.0

優點: Getting off the flight.

缺點: More often than not, Philippine Airlines has been our airline of choice because we found their rates to be fair and flights direct and easy. Despite the fact that the PAL terminal was pretty poor, and the food on board was never really decent, we remained loyal to PAL for quite a few years. On our way back to Melbourne from Manila on June 17, Saturday, Colin, Hendrix and I were awaiting boarding at gate 10 for flight PR 209. Having flown with PAL from Melbourne to Manila (as well as with another airline from Manila to Manchester and back), we understood that the usual procedure was to allow passengers with infants to board first. Due to the lack of order (there were no clear queues in sight), Colin decided to ask 3 different PAL personnel if there was, indeed, a priority queue for people travelling with infants. ALL THREE PERSONNEL ASSURED US THAT THEY WERE NOT YET BOARDING AND THAT WE WOULD BE CALLED UPON PRIOR TO THEM LETTING ANYONE ELSE ON THE PLANE. 2 minutes later, a PAL personnel appears with signage that reads certain row numbers and begins to call out to ALL PASSENGERS FOR BOARDING. Colin swiftly rushes to the front (me and baby in tow) and demands an explanation as to why we were told one thing but are watching them act upon something completely different. I wish I was joking when I tell you that the personnel just stared blankly at us and then carried on checking boarding passes. No apologies, no explanation offered. As soon as we boarded, Colin turned to the first flight steward he saw and asked for a complaint form and told this could ONLY be done online, to which Colin requested we be given the email/web address upon take off. The seats assigned to us were on the right most side of the aircraft, a window and a middle seat. As Colin was placing our bags in the overhead compartment, the steward called to Colin from across the aisle (past the 3 seats in the middle of the plane) to introduce the purser, Jolly Bello. Please note this was happening while people were also trying to get past and get to their seats -and Mr. bello called out across the aisle, "I heard you have a complaint??" to which Colin, baffled, replied "yes do you want to come over here so we aren’t shouting over these people?". Colin yet again told this purser what the complaint was about and was asked (verbatim) "so would you like to make a complaint against THEM?" Would the correct protocol not be to 1. Apologise for any confusion, miscommunication or poor service, 2. Take some responsibility and acknowledge the complaint and 3. Maybe come approach us AFTER TAKE OFF and not while everyone is trying to board the plane? We are no longer choosing Philippine Airlines.

LHR
MNL
尚可 4.6

優點: Birding was great. Punctual flight.

缺點: My entertainment screen broke. It took the crew 7 hours to replace it. A crew member said they would sort it, bit nothing for 6.5 hours There appeared be confusing within the crew members about what food I ordered.

LHR
MNL
7.0

缺點: Seats did not recline very much. Hard. Food was very plain and starchy.

11月27日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
8小時30分鐘
12月4日 週三
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
11小時10分鐘
NT$ 17,307
旅程:8天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
TPE
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: ,很舒適餐點很棒服務很好

缺點: 希望班機準時開行

AKL
BNE
極好 8.0

優點: the flight wasnt too packed so i had enough space and the flight was cheap, worth it.

缺點: the time the flight was available for.

BNE
TPE
極好 9.0

優點: Everything

缺點: Couldn’t fault anything

TPE
KUL
6.3

優點: 服務很好

缺點: 沒有個人娛樂系統 近五小時航程很難捱

TPE
LGW
極好 8.0

缺點: Nothig

11月23日 週六
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
31小時30分鐘
11月26日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
33小時50分鐘
NT$ 18,711
旅程:4天
6.6顯示評論
整體6.6 好
根據6,492篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
HKG
KMG
6.0

優點: Despite the late arrival of the inbound aircraft, the bus boarding was efficient and we were ready to go fairly swiftly. The seats were quite comfortable for a short flight, it was a visibility newish B737-800 aircraft. The food was bland and flavourless, but they did serve fruit and Haagen Dazs

缺點: Again the food was basic apart from the ice cream. The entertainment came in the form of pop down screens that just played a Chinese drama. The single most frustrating thing about flying any Chinese airline though is the blanket ban on all mobile phones during the flight, even in flight mode. A imbisilic and embarrassingly outdated rule that is clearly one of the many achievements of the CCP. Wake up and join the rest of the world!

SWA
SHA
6.6

優點: Punctual. Seat space better than most airline

缺點: Food is meh

KMG
SYD
一般 2.0

優點: I do not think the check in staff could have been any more useless, they wanted us to collect our luggage at every transfer, the plane was cramped, obviously made for people a lot shorter than my 6 ft, majority of the food was not edible for western people. I will not be using them again.

PVG
DEL
一般 2.0

優點: It was cheap but I would not do it again

缺點: I made friends with another passenger who when texting his number introduced himself as ‘XYZ, flight from hell’. That pretty much sums it up but here’s a laundry list of issues I faced on the trip 1. They landed us in a different airport in China and did not inform us on how to get to the other airport (PVG). After several failed attempts of catching a taxi that accepts Visa or US dollars, we finally got a bus that ferried us 2. They also did not automatically transfer the luggage, so I had to carry my two checked in bags to the other one and then stand in a 45 min queue to get them checked in again 3. Unhelpful ground staff 4. Delayed second flight. After a shitty eight hour long layover, we got another 2 5. Horrible food 6. No ear plugs are available in the plane 7. Not a single apology from the crew about the delay Also, anyone who doesn’t speak mandarin needs to understand that the crew in China is not well equipped to understand and help you, so be prepared to have the translation struggle

AMS
PVG
一般 2.0

缺點: 兩件大型行李遺失,航空公司很不負責任!坐飛機成五十次從未有試過遺失行李。還有,空姐很惡。

3月20日 週五
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
15小時05分鐘
3月24日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
29小時45分鐘
NT$ 19,413
旅程:5天
8.7極好顯示評論
整體8.7 極好
根據4,784篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.8
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
GUM
ICN
6.0

優點: the company you gave too me were no good i did like then i hope you please do not give that company too no one i did take the fly on Korea air korea air is good but not the company you gave too me too by my ticket from

YVR
ICN
極好 10.0

優點: Surprising amount of legroom, solid food and very pleasant host staff

AKL
ICN
極好 8.3

優點: Very professional crew good service

缺點: Nothing really pilot couldn't understand him but does it really matter unless is an emergency

SFO
ICN
極好 10.0

優點: Food,

缺點: Nothing

KUL
ICN
極好 10.0

優點: Service was immaculate, friendly staff, smooth flight, comfortable plane. Wonderful experience, would recommend it to everyone.

缺點: None

2月6日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
19小時40分鐘
2月7日 週五
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
28小時25分鐘
NT$ 20,054
旅程:2天
7.9顯示評論
整體7.9 好
根據26,935篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
7.8
食品
7.5
JFK
CLE
一般 2.0

缺點: My daughter was booked on this itinerary and was finishing her last leg of journey. Complete ticket was booked thru Delta Airlines. Her flight from Amsterdam to New York today operated by KLM, was delayed by few minutes. And Delta flight from JFK to Cleveland DL4084 was preponed by airlines. Result was my daughter was not allowed to board the aircraft. Worst was yet to come. Your staff at the gate offered her a flight to Cleveland for next day at 3:30 pm??? Means around 24 hours later. Is this how you behave with a girl of 19 years, asking her to stay at the airport. She was refused Hotel and Lounge stay by your team!!! Is this what you call customer services??? Obscene services is what I would like to term it as!!! My daughter asked them to give this is writing, which was refused to her. Why are your people scared to put it in writing if everything that you are doing is right by the Law??? I was left with no other option but to book her on American Airlines flight today departing at 9 pm to ensure that little girl doesn’t have to spend close to 24 hours at airport by paying $423. Who is going to bear the loss of money and mental torture that your team has given to me and my daughter???? I shall be awaiting your response as to what do you have to say to this pathetic attitude of your team. Rajesh Mendiratta Sent from my iPhone Rajesh

BOS
MSP
一般 2.0

缺點: Delays, delays, delays... first class ticket from BOS to MSP got me a 6 hour delay and a middle seat in econ main cabin at the back of the plane. Delta you suck!

LAX
MCO
6.0

缺點: We had to wait at the customs for nearly 1.5hrs, then pick up our luggage, then check in again!!! We were running and got on the plane 10 mins before the departure. Super stressful!!

DUB
JFK
極好 9.6

優點: Very friendly cabin crew. Comfortable and food was good and drinks and water was plentiful. I would highly recommend Delta for transatlantic flights,compared to so called 4* airline Aer Lingus, then Delta are a 6* in comparison

LGA
MIA
尚可 4.4

優點: N/a

缺點: Explain why there’s over a 2 hour delay

12月24日 週二
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
13小時50分鐘
12月29日 週日
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
34小時35分鐘
NT$ 29,578
旅程:6天
8.3極好顯示評論
整體8.3 極好
根據4,146篇評論
登機
8.4
舒適
8.2
機艙服務員
8.7
娛樂
8.0
食品
8.1
SYD
ICN
6.0

優點: A380

ICN
SIN
極好 8.3

優點: As expected, the crews' service were good. Comfortable seats and nice meals.

缺點: On the way back to Singapore, there was no entertainment in each seat. Didn't expect this and never experience from my previous flight with Asiana. There was the main screen in the centre but I can't choose and the lights were on all the way when I tried to sleep. Disappointed that they didn't inform in advance. People expect Asiana as same as SQ which provides full of new equipment such as personal screen on each seat.

NRT
ICN
尚可 4.0

優點: For the duration of 5.5hours, 1 main meal and 1 snack were served. Prompt drinks and meal service

缺點: No personal inflight entertainment. Only a few screens from the ceiling, with poor viewing angles.

ICN
NRT
7.3

缺點: 2 hour delay from Incheon to Tokyo. Messed up our travel plan a bit.

ICN
UUS
6.6

優點: Many empty seats meant I could get some sleep

11月24日 週日
TSA
台北松山
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
18小時00分鐘
11月27日 週三
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TSA
台北松山
29小時00分鐘
NT$ 30,249
旅程:4天
8.7極好顯示評論
整體8.7 極好
根據4,346篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.9
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
NGO
BKK
7.6

優點: The aircraft was clean and boarding went smoothly. The flight was late but the staff seemed courteous, polite, and apologetic for the delay.

缺點: I thought I had ordered a vegetarian meal when I booked the flight roughly 1.5 months prior to my trip. However, when the meal was being served, there was only a chicken or pork option and my vegetarian meal had either not been properly booked or had been forgotten. When I informed the staff, I was asked to show proof that I ordered a veggie meal. I could not pull up my email confirmation as we were flying and there was no internet access. I had to lug my bag out of the overhead and search for a print out confirmation. I had not come prepared with the "evidence" the stewardess wanted. While the staff tried to be polite, I also found them to be quite rude, demanding that I produce evidence. Could they not have simply given me an extra salad without all the fuss? I felt I was being treated as a criminal for requesting a veggie meal that had, unfortunately, not been recorded in their system.

BOS
NRT
極好 8.6

優點: The lovely cabin crew

缺點: Leg room was a bit tight due to the entertainment box, and in-flight entertainment didn't have enough of a movie and music selection.

KIX
HNL
極好 9.6

優點: The friendliness of the crew and the comfort of the seat + size of the screen

缺點: Possibly more food options could of been better, only had western or Japanese option

SYD
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: Service was excellent. Premium economy seats well worth the few extra $$.

NRT
SIN
6.0

缺點: Double standard

11月21日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
17小時40分鐘
11月26日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
27小時40分鐘
NT$ 17,063
旅程:6天
7.3顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據2,870篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
8.0
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
PVG
MNL
尚可 5.6

缺點: Delayed for 2.5 hours.

SYD
MNL
尚可 4.6

優點: Clean and new airplane. Good screen Nice staff good space between the seats

缺點: Bad snacks, very limited baverage served. Limited selection of movies. very very limited TV shows. Almost no music to my taste, need to upgrade their music options!!

YVR
MNL
一般 2.0

缺點: Flight crews working at transfer desks were extremely unorganized and brought us to our terminal at the very last minute when the flight was calling for all passengers to board. Food was terrible. Ended up losing my baggage because they didn’t have enough time to put all the bags onto the flight and so I had to wait an extra two hours at the airport

KIX
TPE
極好 10.0

優點: 不錯 但臉臭

缺點: 目前無

NRT
MNL
極好 9.3

優點: Best in flight entertainment for any airline I've used

缺點: More food options

11月27日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
8小時30分鐘
12月4日 週三
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
11小時10分鐘
NT$ 17,307
旅程:8天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
SYD
TPE
7.6

優點: I liked the crew members. They were welcoming and professional. Flight fare was very good in value for waiting a few extra hours in Taipei. I could do some shopping there while I was in transit. Nice airport. The screens of my row were not working so they restarted all screens a few times. While the screens of my row worked, other rows were not working. Surprisingly no one fixed or complaint as the screens of other rows kept off from the start to the end of the flight. I felt so sorry for others.

缺點: Like what I said in "what I like", I think the connection of the screens/tablets had some issues. Luckily mine worked. I would be upset if my screen did not work during the entire 9 hours flight.

HKG
TPE
尚可 4.6

優點: 差不多要下機才吃到晚餐, 份量十分少.一個76歲的老人家都説不夠.

PVG
TPE
尚可 5.6

優點: Quite comfortable, met my expectations and I rested. On board team were friendly and helpful.

缺點: Lounge in TPE is awful! Over crowded, noisy and a mess. I wouldn’t fly CI again just from the lounge experience.

TPE
MEL
極好 10.0

優點: Cabin fitout is cozy and comfortable. Great service onboard and free WiFi for Premium customers

缺點: Taoyuan airport facilities

KIX
TPE
極好 8.3

優點: The boarding by zones is a great way to do it and they implemented it efficiently. The crew were outstanding - pleasant, smiley and courteous and made me feel welcomed. Meals were delicious.

缺點: A bit cramped and not quite enough toilets in economy class. Always a long queue for the toilet.

11月23日 週六
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
31小時30分鐘
11月26日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
33小時50分鐘
NT$ 18,711
旅程:4天
6.6顯示評論
整體6.6 好
根據6,492篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
PVG
SIN
尚可 4.6

優點: Friendly staff

缺點: Very disappointed with seat, choice of movies and food was not edible. Very poor when compared to business class on other airlines.

AMS
PVG
一般 2.0

缺點: 兩件大型行李遺失,航空公司很不負責任!坐飛機成五十次從未有試過遺失行李。還有,空姐很惡。

PVG
CEB
極好 10.0

優點: same as before Staff excellent and nice with everybody

缺點: the foods

PVG
HKG
尚可 4.3

缺點: Long waiting queue 100+ People and only 2 staff working for standard check in. No baggage drop for already checked in passenger

PVG
XIY
極好 9.6

優點: Professional and quick boarding

4月15日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
9小時20分鐘
4月19日 週日
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
10小時35分鐘
NT$ 17,490
旅程:5天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
SYD
TPE
極好 8.0

缺點: Nothing

SIN
TPE
極好 10.0

優點: Warm service from check-in to destination. Counter staff arranged, without hesitation, upon my casual asking if could change to window seating and she did it with a smile (though I've web-checked in already). Service on flight was heart-warming too!

缺點: -

FRA
TPE
7.3

缺點: the food to much asian

TPE
HKG
極好 9.0

優點: 機組服務人員很週到

缺點: 沒有

TPE
PUS
6.3

優點: Crew excellent

缺點: Cramped.

3月20日 週五
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
15小時05分鐘
3月24日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
29小時45分鐘
NT$ 19,413
旅程:5天
8.7極好顯示評論
整體8.7 極好
根據4,784篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.8
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
ICN
PRG
7.3

優點: Services from the crew and the seat are what expected being in eco-normic class.

缺點: can upgrade or afford to go by at least business class

YVR
ICN
極好 9.0

優點: I liked their positive & happy attitudes as well as their work ethic.

缺點: Perhaps there could have been a larger & wider selection of movies. I would have liked to have had a hard copy menu so that I could make a more informed choice with my meals.

ICN
KUL
極好 9.0

優點: Boarding is systematic, all items in order. The food was nice. Love the leg room space.

HKT
ICN
一般 2.6

優點: The 2nd flight plane was alright

缺點: Flight attendants have poor English and get upset if you ask for snacks or anything that makes them have to get supplies

PUS
HKG
極好 9.0

缺點: since it is the overnight flight, everyone was so tired but still serve food....... for the poeple who was sleeping, the smell was unpleasant.

11月21日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
17小時40分鐘
11月30日 週六
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
15小時05分鐘
NT$ 17,948
旅程:10天
7.3顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據2,870篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
8.0
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
LHR
MNL
一般 2.0

優點: onboard service was good

缺點: 17 hour delay

KIX
TPE
極好 10.0

優點: 不錯 但臉臭

缺點: 目前無

HKG
MNL
一般 2.0

缺點: Extremely bad experience, the airline rejected to issue boarding pass to us without an appropiate explanation. Never take Phillipine airlines anymore

MEL
MNL
一般 2.0

優點: You ripped me off

缺點: you ripped me off

CEB
MNL
7.6

優點: got lucky and no one sat next to me. Boarding was fast

缺點: No Entertainment module, have to pay for Wifi

2月6日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
19小時40分鐘
2月7日 週五
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
28小時25分鐘
NT$ 20,054
旅程:2天
7.9顯示評論
整體7.9 好
根據26,935篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
7.8
食品
7.5
AMS
BOM
極好 8.0

優點: Always Veg Meal for All

缺點: N A

BOS
LHR
7.0

缺點: Plane was late taking off. Crew did not provide water when requested. They were busy with beverages that they could sell at a cost.

JFK
MSY
極好 8.0

優點: Flight was early into New Orleans

缺點: Flight had a lot of turbulence

CUN
MSP
尚可 5.3

優點: Movies

缺點: I hate the biscuits and water... really? On a 3hrs and 30 minutes flight. You guyz can do better

MSO
SLC
7.0

缺點: Ran 2 1/2 hours late, poor customer communication

11月7日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
31小時30分鐘
11月12日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
33小時50分鐘
NT$ 18,742
旅程:6天
6.6顯示評論
整體6.6 好
根據6,492篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
AKL
PVG
6.3

優點: good selection of movies

缺點: food

YYZ
PVG
一般 2.3

優點: I hated the airline!

缺點: The food was terrible and the staff was not nice at all. Worst airline.

SYD
CFS
極好 10.0

優點: Clean, comfortable and ahead ov time

缺點: Nothing

HKG
KMG
6.0

優點: Despite the late arrival of the inbound aircraft, the bus boarding was efficient and we were ready to go fairly swiftly. The seats were quite comfortable for a short flight, it was a visibility newish B737-800 aircraft. The food was bland and flavourless, but they did serve fruit and Haagen Dazs

缺點: Again the food was basic apart from the ice cream. The entertainment came in the form of pop down screens that just played a Chinese drama. The single most frustrating thing about flying any Chinese airline though is the blanket ban on all mobile phones during the flight, even in flight mode. A imbisilic and embarrassingly outdated rule that is clearly one of the many achievements of the CCP. Wake up and join the rest of the world!

PVG
AKL
6.6

優點: Good selection of movies

缺點: The food were not fresh and ill prepared

4月15日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
9小時20分鐘
4月19日 週日
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
10小時35分鐘
NT$ 17,490
旅程:5天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
AKL
BNE
極好 9.6

優點: Enjoyed everything about my flight.Awesome service from the crew most welcoming.Plenty of leg room and comfortable seating.I have already recommend this airline to family and friends.

缺點: Nothing

HKG
TPE
尚可 5.3

缺點: 電視機太小了,而且那屏幕根本很難看得清晰,太朦了。飲料沒什麼選擇,只有茶和咖啡。

TPE
BNE
7.3

優點: Quite comfortable, met my expectations and I slept well. On board team were friendly and helpful.

缺點: Lounge in TPE is awful! Over crowded, noisy and a mess. I wouldn’t fly CI again just from the lounge experience.

TPE
PUS
6.3

優點: Crew excellent

缺點: Cramped.

RMQ
HKG
一般 2.0

優點: Food was ok

缺點: End to end experience, was not informed in advance when we purchased the tickets in regards to the baggage when in transit flights

11月21日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
17小時40分鐘
11月30日 週六
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
15小時05分鐘
NT$ 17,948
旅程:10天
7.3顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據2,870篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
8.0
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
TPE
KIX
尚可 5.0

缺點: Pr896 use small flight with 3+3 a row seat. No video or other media service. We onboard after 2 hours later of the original time because the flight is delayed.

SYD
MNL
極好 8.0

優點: Crew are very helpful.

缺點: Need reclining seats

MNL
MEL
一般 2.0

優點: Getting off the flight.

缺點: More often than not, Philippine Airlines has been our airline of choice because we found their rates to be fair and flights direct and easy. Despite the fact that the PAL terminal was pretty poor, and the food on board was never really decent, we remained loyal to PAL for quite a few years. On our way back to Melbourne from Manila on June 17, Saturday, Colin, Hendrix and I were awaiting boarding at gate 10 for flight PR 209. Having flown with PAL from Melbourne to Manila (as well as with another airline from Manila to Manchester and back), we understood that the usual procedure was to allow passengers with infants to board first. Due to the lack of order (there were no clear queues in sight), Colin decided to ask 3 different PAL personnel if there was, indeed, a priority queue for people travelling with infants. ALL THREE PERSONNEL ASSURED US THAT THEY WERE NOT YET BOARDING AND THAT WE WOULD BE CALLED UPON PRIOR TO THEM LETTING ANYONE ELSE ON THE PLANE. 2 minutes later, a PAL personnel appears with signage that reads certain row numbers and begins to call out to ALL PASSENGERS FOR BOARDING. Colin swiftly rushes to the front (me and baby in tow) and demands an explanation as to why we were told one thing but are watching them act upon something completely different. I wish I was joking when I tell you that the personnel just stared blankly at us and then carried on checking boarding passes. No apologies, no explanation offered. As soon as we boarded, Colin turned to the first flight steward he saw and asked for a complaint form and told this could ONLY be done online, to which Colin requested we be given the email/web address upon take off. The seats assigned to us were on the right most side of the aircraft, a window and a middle seat. As Colin was placing our bags in the overhead compartment, the steward called to Colin from across the aisle (past the 3 seats in the middle of the plane) to introduce the purser, Jolly Bello. Please note this was happening while people were also trying to get past and get to their seats -and Mr. bello called out across the aisle, "I heard you have a complaint??" to which Colin, baffled, replied "yes do you want to come over here so we aren’t shouting over these people?". Colin yet again told this purser what the complaint was about and was asked (verbatim) "so would you like to make a complaint against THEM?" Would the correct protocol not be to 1. Apologise for any confusion, miscommunication or poor service, 2. Take some responsibility and acknowledge the complaint and 3. Maybe come approach us AFTER TAKE OFF and not while everyone is trying to board the plane? We are no longer choosing Philippine Airlines.

MNL
LHR
極好 9.6

優點: I was very lucky to have two spaces beside me so plenty of room however I know this is not always the case. This plaine was modern with a good selection of inflight entertainment. The on board staff were extreamly courteous and helpful. Food was okay was a good selection of beverages on this flight. You are provided with inlight comforts like blackets etc if you wished to sleep -

缺點: No complaints on this flight

LHR
MNL
7.3

優點: The staff were courteous is very helpful ,the food was okay. In flight comforts were provided such as blacked , eye mask etc. iPads were provided as there was no built in tvs on the plane which provided a good inlight entertainment system. Overall this was a good experience as value for money as the price was cheaper than many other direct long haul flights

缺點: The plane it’s self was quite old and tired - with no TVs however iPads were provided which was not a huge difference. There was not a good selection of beverages on this flight -most had ran out prior.

2月12日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
15小時05分鐘
2月17日 週一
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
17小時00分鐘
NT$ 20,054
旅程:6天
7.9顯示評論
整體7.9 好
根據26,935篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
7.8
食品
7.5
JFK
YYZ
極好 10.0

缺點: Good

BOS
LHR
7.0

缺點: Plane was late taking off. Crew did not provide water when requested. They were busy with beverages that they could sell at a cost.

DCA
JFK
極好 8.6

優點: extra legroom of comfort plus zone

缺點: Bordung process runs smoother now that the order is made clear ahead of time. In jfk they did not have the columns marked “comfort” “priority? “Main 3”, etc, like they had at Reagan arpoirt in DC

DEN
LAX
極好 8.3

優點: Check in Denver super helpful Gate staff hustled to turn around flight Flight crew excellent

缺點: Flight delayed, almost missed international connections

LAX
MCO
6.0

缺點: We had to wait at the customs for nearly 1.5hrs, then pick up our luggage, then check in again!!! We were running and got on the plane 10 mins before the departure. Super stressful!!

11月7日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
31小時30分鐘
11月12日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
33小時50分鐘
NT$ 18,742
旅程:6天
6.6顯示評論
整體6.6 好
根據6,492篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
PVG
AMS
一般 2.0

缺點: the flight was 30 minutes late, which caused me to miss my connection AMS-LDN, where my cousin was waiting to take me on to my Auntys Funeral at 10.30. MU head flight attendant said at first the flight was NOT late, even though we were scheduled to depart at 1245 we waited on tarmac until 1.15 and arrived AMS at 7.10 instead of 6.35.When I pointed out this lie she said "not our problem, speak to KLM lady on ground" ...I did ..and am now waiting for a flight at 13.20 TO A DIFFERENT AIRPORT IN LONDON, and 3 hrs AFTER my aunt's funeral.MU..the worst thing is I have them on my return flight to Japan.I am thinking if forfeiting that leg and booking with and airline that cares about their customers, instead of just taking your money.MU never again. Let them treat their own citizens with contempt.

XIY
HKG
6.0

優點: It flew

缺點: Flight departure time was wrong in Kayak and flight stood at Xi'an airport for 40 mins + arrived at the satellite terminal in HK which meant a bus. Long wait for bags too

HKG
KMG
6.0

優點: Despite the late arrival of the inbound aircraft, the bus boarding was efficient and we were ready to go fairly swiftly. The seats were quite comfortable for a short flight, it was a visibility newish B737-800 aircraft. The food was bland and flavourless, but they did serve fruit and Haagen Dazs

缺點: Again the food was basic apart from the ice cream. The entertainment came in the form of pop down screens that just played a Chinese drama. The single most frustrating thing about flying any Chinese airline though is the blanket ban on all mobile phones during the flight, even in flight mode. A imbisilic and embarrassingly outdated rule that is clearly one of the many achievements of the CCP. Wake up and join the rest of the world!

PVG
SIN
一般 2.0

缺點: 1. The flight delay. 2. Horrible food. 3. In-flight entertainment set wasn't working. When we told the stewardess about it, it wasn't addressed till the flight was about to land. Which was by then, rather useless. They gave a a complimentary bottle of wine though.

CDG
PVG
7.0

優點: clean cabin, nice service, smooth connection

缺點: some of the crew didn't understand English very well, not much movie choice on board

11月10日 週日
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
8小時30分鐘
11月17日 週日
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
11小時10分鐘
NT$ 17,643
旅程:8天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
TPE
LGW
極好 10.0

優點: Awesome crew, full flat seat

缺點: Western menu

AKL
BNE
極好 8.0

優點: The food and entertainment was excellent. Thr crew are friendly and luxurious plane comforts make it worth the trip paid for.

缺點: Not enough fresh air, breathing quality was poor before take off. We had fumes from jet gases leaking in through the air conditioning, but once the plane departed the quality improved.

AKL
BNE
極好 9.6

優點: Enjoyed everything about my flight.Awesome service from the crew most welcoming.Plenty of leg room and comfortable seating.I have already recommend this airline to family and friends.

缺點: Nothing

SIN
TPE
極好 10.0

優點: Warm service from check-in to destination. Counter staff arranged, without hesitation, upon my casual asking if could change to window seating and she did it with a smile (though I've web-checked in already). Service on flight was heart-warming too!

缺點: -

TPE
HKG
極好 9.0

優點: 機組服務人員很週到

缺點: 沒有

*
價格為包含所有稅項與費用的單人價,僅適用於電子票,而使用貨幣為TWD。

我們致力取得精確價格,但是沒辦法保證價格

原因如下:

我們不是賣家
KAYAK不設定價格,所以不能保證其他公司販賣的產品。

我們負責搜集眾多資料
我們的服務讓你迅速輕鬆同時比較數百家旅遊網站的搜尋結果,所以KAYAK是個搜尋引擎,無法保證找到的價格。

為什麼價格不能總是100%準確?
機位、飯店房間和租車的價格可能經常變動。同一時間內也可能有很多人同時嘗試購買相同的旅程選項。所以,有時候你可能會發現有些標價已經沒有位子了。

有更多疑問或者想跟我們舉報錯誤票價
請給我們寄送 電郵 我們團隊成員將很快跟你聯絡。

1
  • 來回
  • 單程
  • 多程
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
  • 多個艙等
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙