價格以新臺幣顯示。

HNL

搜尋台北飛往檀香山的便宜機票

來回
經濟艙
威奇托 (ICT)
檀香山 Honolulu
11月21日 週四
11月28日 週四
任何月份
比較KAYAK和 |
同時搜尋數百家旅遊網站,為你尋找飛往檀香山的機票優惠

台北往檀香山航班資訊

平均飛行時間 9小時53分鐘
航班降落地點 檀香山
航班出發地點 台北
機票價格 NT$ 17,063
距離 8,118公里
航空公司 菲律賓航空, 中華航空, 中國東方航空, 大韓航空, 達美航空, 韓亞航空, 日本航空

搜尋便宜機票小秘訣

便宜機票參考數據:25%搜尋此航線的用戶找到NT$ 19,423或更低價格。

預訂台北飛往檀香山機票的常見問題

KAYAK如何找到這麼便宜的機票價格?
KAYAK每年處理超過20億個旅遊搜尋,並顯示從數百個航空公司和第三方網站上所得的價格,讓你一次比較機票價格和選項。它同時亦顯示超過二百萬家飯店,還有租車、假期套票、活動等搜尋結果,以及數百萬個獲驗證的評價,讓用戶查看最多的旅遊選項。
KAYAK組合如何幫助我省錢?
KAYAK組合讓你結合不同航空公司的單程機票,因爲這樣比購買來回機票更便宜。
KAYAK所搜尋的機票供應商是否比同行競爭者多?
對,相比網上旅行社,KAYAK取得的數據和資訊較多,因此在全球各地的準確性亦較佳。
KAYAK的機票價格預測如何幫助我把握預訂的最佳時機?
KAYAK的機票價格預測工具使用歷史數據,以估計指定目的地和日期的價格會否在7天內有所改變,讓旅客知道應該立即預訂,還是等候一下。

預訂台北往檀香山的便宜機票(來回)

機場
出發地
台北
NT$ 30,249
僅選
NT$ 30,249
NT$ 17,063
僅選
NT$ 17,063
目的地
檀香山
NT$ 17,063
僅選
NT$ 17,063
11月21日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
17小時40分鐘
11月26日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
27小時40分鐘
NT$ 17,063
旅程:6天
7.3顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據2,870篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
8.0
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
MEL
MNL
一般 2.0

優點: You ripped me off

缺點: you ripped me off

CEB
USU
一般 2.0

優點: No direct contact details to change flight

缺點: Terrible customer service

MNL
HKG
6.0

缺點: The lounge is awful.

SIN
MNL
6.0

缺點: Flight was delayed

MNL
SYD
尚可 4.3

優點: Toilets were kept clean through out the flight. New and clean airplane. Good space between the seats.

缺點: Flight attendant was rude in general (serving food, drinks, answering questions), he skipped rows when giving hot towels (I wasn't served a hot towel). In-flight entertainment: limited movie selection, even more limited tv shows selection. Music section was very poor, it needs more selection with variaty, known artists, more radio channels. And music tracks should be in a tracklist form with song information, not only 1 hour-long tracks of back to back music (with no info). Meals - Mains were ok, deserts were terrible in both of my flights. Snacks were also bad, a scone and beef and cheese sandwich. Very blend, white bread only and oily. We weren't served enough bevarages, so oily and high-carb foods made me very thursty. No water fountains, it'd be great to have some around since staff does not give enough beverage and I was forced to chuck my water before boarding the airplane (the water I bought in the airport after passport check!!!!!!!) It was extremely cold.

11月27日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
8小時30分鐘
12月4日 週三
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
11小時10分鐘
NT$ 17,307
旅程:8天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
TPE
HKG
尚可 5.0

缺點: 電視屏幕太細太舊

HKG
CGK
一般 3.3

缺點: The seat pitch is quite narrow makes plane feel crowded. Flight attendant does not pay attention to the request

TPE
LGW
極好 10.0

優點: Awesome crew, full flat seat

缺點: Western menu

TPE
HKG
極好 8.0

優點: I was surprised that they provided meal for less than 1.5 hour flight. The fare was very affordable for only a few extra hours waiting in Taipei. Very happy with their service. I will definitely use China Airlines again.

缺點: Nothing I didn't like.

TPE
KUL
6.3

優點: 服務很好

缺點: 沒有個人娛樂系統 近五小時航程很難捱

11月23日 週六
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
31小時30分鐘
11月26日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
33小時50分鐘
NT$ 18,711
旅程:4天
6.6顯示評論
整體6.6 好
根據6,492篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
PVG
YVR
極好 8.0

優點: Same as above

缺點: Same as above

CTU
KMG
極好 10.0

優點: Loads of space. Super crew,

缺點: Nothing. It was perfect.

LGW
PVG
尚可 5.6

優點: Left on time.

缺點: Food very unappetising. Poor movie selection

FCO
PVG
極好 9.3

優點: New planes. Spotlessly clean. Hard working helpful staff. Good boarding. Adequate legroom by modern standards. Food typical of economy these days. OK. But really good staff.

缺點: Fried rice breakfast out of Rome. Mushy. But overall food out of Sydney, Rome and Shanghai, fine.

PVG
HKG
尚可 4.3

缺點: Long waiting queue 100+ People and only 2 staff working for standard check in. No baggage drop for already checked in passenger

3月20日 週五
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
15小時05分鐘
3月24日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
29小時45分鐘
NT$ 19,413
旅程:5天
8.7極好顯示評論
整體8.7 極好
根據4,784篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.8
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
SIN
ICN
極好 9.0

優點: The air hostess is very kind and helpful when she noticed that I was not well and she has offered me a honey lemon drink even I didn't request.

ICN
YYZ
極好 10.0

優點: Crew, food, comfort, entertainment and many good things

缺點: I love everything

YYZ
ICN
尚可 4.0

優點: I liked sleeping

缺點: The flight attendants don’t understand English well so asking for water or some items I was completely ignored. To make up for lack of WiFI actually the entertainment system is awful. They ran out of food items and did not return to replenish drinks or remove waste

PUS
HKG
極好 9.0

缺點: since it is the overnight flight, everyone was so tired but still serve food....... for the poeple who was sleeping, the smell was unpleasant.

SEA
ICN
極好 9.6

優點: Great service, plenty of leg room, exceptional staff. Toilets refreshed often. Will def fly again.

缺點: More detailed online infor for kids food. Australian fried rice varies greatly from korean!!! Potato crisp packets of chips would be a good snack option for kids instead of prawn crackers / brownies. Kids like plain stuff!

2月6日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
19小時40分鐘
2月7日 週五
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
28小時25分鐘
NT$ 20,054
旅程:2天
7.9顯示評論
整體7.9 好
根據26,935篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
7.8
食品
7.5
JFK
YYZ
極好 10.0

缺點: Good

JFK
ATL
一般 2.0

優點: Nothing

JFK
DUB
7.6

優點: The crew were fantastic. Departed on time, arrived 40 minutes early.

缺點: Delta One is a bit jaded on this flight.

MSP
ORD
尚可 5.0

缺點: Plane journey awful. Speaker had a loud buzzing noise all the time so never heard a word bad landing. Rattling plane Very cold.

LAX
MCO
6.0

缺點: We had to wait at the customs for nearly 1.5hrs, then pick up our luggage, then check in again!!! We were running and got on the plane 10 mins before the departure. Super stressful!!

12月24日 週二
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
13小時50分鐘
12月29日 週日
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
34小時35分鐘
NT$ 29,578
旅程:6天
8.3極好顯示評論
整體8.3 極好
根據4,146篇評論
登機
8.4
舒適
8.2
機艙服務員
8.7
娛樂
8.0
食品
8.1
ICN
SIN
極好 8.3

優點: As expected, the crews' service were good. Comfortable seats and nice meals.

缺點: On the way back to Singapore, there was no entertainment in each seat. Didn't expect this and never experience from my previous flight with Asiana. There was the main screen in the centre but I can't choose and the lights were on all the way when I tried to sleep. Disappointed that they didn't inform in advance. People expect Asiana as same as SQ which provides full of new equipment such as personal screen on each seat.

NRT
ICN
尚可 4.0

優點: For the duration of 5.5hours, 1 main meal and 1 snack were served. Prompt drinks and meal service

缺點: No personal inflight entertainment. Only a few screens from the ceiling, with poor viewing angles.

ICN
LAX
7.6

缺點: No vegetarian food.

HNL
ICN
6.0

缺點: i understand that is a Korean airlines, but you are flying in international route, please prepare some English material,such as if you don't let people use our own pillow, the explanation material cannot be in Korean Only.

KIX
ICN
7.6

優點: Business class seats are a lot more comfortable than earlier versions.

11月24日 週日
TSA
台北松山
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
18小時00分鐘
11月27日 週三
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TSA
台北松山
29小時00分鐘
NT$ 30,249
旅程:4天
8.7極好顯示評論
整體8.7 極好
根據4,346篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.9
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
NRT
DEL
7.3

缺點: Very good airline except for the fact that the staff at Narita airport.

CGK
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: Easily upgrade to premium economy class

缺點: Some staff lack of basic english

JFK
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: The food (Japanese) clearly was a league of its own. Service was prompt, attentive yet discreet.

缺點: Selection of video entertainment could be increased and improved.

NRT
ORD
極好 9.6

優點: Comfortable plane, good service

NGO
HND
7.6

優點: Service and polite staff.

缺點: Not much space between the seats for my long legs.

11月21日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
17小時40分鐘
11月26日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
27小時40分鐘
NT$ 17,063
旅程:6天
7.3顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據2,870篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
8.0
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
LHR
MNL
極好 10.0

優點: Fantastic onboard product in Business Class. Superb seating with all direct aisle access, excellent meals and friendly F/A's.

缺點: I was a little concerned at the lax approach to securing the cabin for take off and landing the F/A's had. The Philippine Airlines lounge is an embarrassment for an airlines hub airport.

NRT
MNL
一般 2.0

缺點: Flight delays several hours. Its a very terrible flight. No apology from airlines company too.

MNL
SYD
極好 9.3

優點: Excellent crew, very attentive and polite. New/newly refurbished plane and very clean.

缺點: I thought I read somewhere that Premium Economy had their own toilets but that didn't seem to be the case. The Mabuhay Lounge (for those with access) is in need of a renovation and can be hard to find seats.

SYD
MNL
極好 8.0

優點: Crew are very helpful.

缺點: Need reclining seats

KIX
TPE
極好 10.0

優點: 不錯 但臉臭

缺點: 目前無

11月27日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
8小時30分鐘
12月4日 週三
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
11小時10分鐘
NT$ 17,307
旅程:8天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
SYD
TPE
一般 3.0

缺點: Everything was a joke to a West standard

TPE
LGW
極好 10.0

優點: Awesome crew, full flat seat

缺點: Western menu

HKG
TPE
尚可 5.3

缺點: 電視機太小了,而且那屏幕根本很難看得清晰,太朦了。飲料沒什麼選擇,只有茶和咖啡。

OKA
TPE
極好 9.0

優點: Prompt and customer-oriented service. Thank you to counter staff for arranging the seat change. I thought I had confirmed the seating during web-checkin but was told that there was no history of confirming the seats in the system.

缺點: A change of snack for to and fro journey would be good.

TPE
LGW
7.0

優點: Phone charging, laptop socket, nice legroom and smart recline system means legroom gets better when the guy in front reclines. Toilets clean. New aircraft, attentive crew. AIRBUS A350 IS THE BEST!!!

缺點: Food okay could have been better. Entertainment system excellent but television shows section could have been better.

11月23日 週六
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
31小時30分鐘
11月26日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
33小時50分鐘
NT$ 18,711
旅程:4天
6.6顯示評論
整體6.6 好
根據6,492篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
BKK
PVG
7.3

優點: Short layover, very good price.

缺點: Very obvious the crew (at least in my section) have a problem with Non- Chinese people. Their attitude changed to others as well as me when they are asked for something. Very noticeable!!!!!!

PVG
AKL
6.6

優點: Good selection of movies

缺點: The food were not fresh and ill prepared

FCO
PVG
極好 9.3

優點: New planes. Spotlessly clean. Hard working helpful staff. Good boarding. Adequate legroom by modern standards. Food typical of economy these days. OK. But really good staff.

缺點: Fried rice breakfast out of Rome. Mushy. But overall food out of Sydney, Rome and Shanghai, fine.

PVG
SIN
尚可 4.6

優點: Friendly staff

缺點: Very disappointed with seat, choice of movies and food was not edible. Very poor when compared to business class on other airlines.

PVG
CDG
7.3

優點: Plane was okay/good. Crew was good.

缺點: Food

4月15日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
9小時20分鐘
4月19日 週日
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
10小時35分鐘
NT$ 17,490
旅程:5天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
AKL
BNE
極好 8.0

優點: The food and entertainment was excellent. Thr crew are friendly and luxurious plane comforts make it worth the trip paid for.

缺點: Not enough fresh air, breathing quality was poor before take off. We had fumes from jet gases leaking in through the air conditioning, but once the plane departed the quality improved.

BNE
AKL
極好 8.6

優點: Great service with drinks and water. The seats were super comfortable!! The plane ride was smooth. The hostess/hosts were excellent and had really nice manners.

缺點: I like everything

TPE
HKG
尚可 5.0

缺點: 電視屏幕太細太舊

KIX
TPE
極好 8.3

優點: The boarding by zones is a great way to do it and they implemented it efficiently. The crew were outstanding - pleasant, smiley and courteous and made me feel welcomed. Meals were delicious.

缺點: A bit cramped and not quite enough toilets in economy class. Always a long queue for the toilet.

AKL
BNE
極好 8.0

優點: the flight wasnt too packed so i had enough space and the flight was cheap, worth it.

缺點: the time the flight was available for.

3月20日 週五
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
15小時05分鐘
3月24日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
29小時45分鐘
NT$ 19,413
旅程:5天
8.7極好顯示評論
整體8.7 極好
根據4,784篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.8
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
HKT
ICN
一般 2.6

優點: The 2nd flight plane was alright

缺點: Flight attendants have poor English and get upset if you ask for snacks or anything that makes them have to get supplies

ICN
BKK
極好 8.0

優點: Same as above.

ICN
PRG
7.3

優點: Services from the crew and the seat are what expected being in eco-normic class.

缺點: can upgrade or afford to go by at least business class

SIN
ICN
極好 9.0

優點: The air hostess is very kind and helpful when she noticed that I was not well and she has offered me a honey lemon drink even I didn't request.

ICN
PUS
尚可 4.3

缺點: It was delayed for two hrs for 50mns domestic flight. An i missed connecting bus so had to pay extra 100usd!

11月21日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
17小時40分鐘
11月30日 週六
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
15小時05分鐘
NT$ 17,948
旅程:10天
7.3顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據2,870篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
8.0
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
MNL
MEL
一般 2.0

優點: Getting off the flight.

缺點: More often than not, Philippine Airlines has been our airline of choice because we found their rates to be fair and flights direct and easy. Despite the fact that the PAL terminal was pretty poor, and the food on board was never really decent, we remained loyal to PAL for quite a few years. On our way back to Melbourne from Manila on June 17, Saturday, Colin, Hendrix and I were awaiting boarding at gate 10 for flight PR 209. Having flown with PAL from Melbourne to Manila (as well as with another airline from Manila to Manchester and back), we understood that the usual procedure was to allow passengers with infants to board first. Due to the lack of order (there were no clear queues in sight), Colin decided to ask 3 different PAL personnel if there was, indeed, a priority queue for people travelling with infants. ALL THREE PERSONNEL ASSURED US THAT THEY WERE NOT YET BOARDING AND THAT WE WOULD BE CALLED UPON PRIOR TO THEM LETTING ANYONE ELSE ON THE PLANE. 2 minutes later, a PAL personnel appears with signage that reads certain row numbers and begins to call out to ALL PASSENGERS FOR BOARDING. Colin swiftly rushes to the front (me and baby in tow) and demands an explanation as to why we were told one thing but are watching them act upon something completely different. I wish I was joking when I tell you that the personnel just stared blankly at us and then carried on checking boarding passes. No apologies, no explanation offered. As soon as we boarded, Colin turned to the first flight steward he saw and asked for a complaint form and told this could ONLY be done online, to which Colin requested we be given the email/web address upon take off. The seats assigned to us were on the right most side of the aircraft, a window and a middle seat. As Colin was placing our bags in the overhead compartment, the steward called to Colin from across the aisle (past the 3 seats in the middle of the plane) to introduce the purser, Jolly Bello. Please note this was happening while people were also trying to get past and get to their seats -and Mr. bello called out across the aisle, "I heard you have a complaint??" to which Colin, baffled, replied "yes do you want to come over here so we aren’t shouting over these people?". Colin yet again told this purser what the complaint was about and was asked (verbatim) "so would you like to make a complaint against THEM?" Would the correct protocol not be to 1. Apologise for any confusion, miscommunication or poor service, 2. Take some responsibility and acknowledge the complaint and 3. Maybe come approach us AFTER TAKE OFF and not while everyone is trying to board the plane? We are no longer choosing Philippine Airlines.

PVG
MNL
尚可 5.0

優點: Crew service

缺點: No announcement for boarding and flight delayed.

MNL
YYZ
極好 9.3

優點: Food and service were good, so was inflight entertainment

缺點: Plane VERY crowded Although it left Manila on time, it arrived 1 hour late in Toronto

LHR
MNL
7.3

優點: The staff were courteous is very helpful ,the food was okay. In flight comforts were provided such as blacked , eye mask etc. iPads were provided as there was no built in tvs on the plane which provided a good inlight entertainment system. Overall this was a good experience as value for money as the price was cheaper than many other direct long haul flights

缺點: The plane it’s self was quite old and tired - with no TVs however iPads were provided which was not a huge difference. There was not a good selection of beverages on this flight -most had ran out prior.

TPE
KIX
尚可 5.0

缺點: Pr896 use small flight with 3+3 a row seat. No video or other media service. We onboard after 2 hours later of the original time because the flight is delayed.

2月6日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
19小時40分鐘
2月7日 週五
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
28小時25分鐘
NT$ 20,054
旅程:2天
7.9顯示評論
整體7.9 好
根據26,935篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
7.8
食品
7.5
JFK
AUS
一般 2.0

缺點: 4 hour delay on take-off and despite that my luggage didn't make it onto the flight.

JFK
DUB
極好 10.0

優點: Service

缺點: Nothing

LHR
DTW
一般 2.3

優點: It was horrible. Delta really should have cancelled and refunded the flight altogether.

AMS
MSP
極好 10.0

缺點: I fly regular this was an excellent flight

LAX
SYD
尚可 4.6

優點: Was upgraded to Comfort Plus after they had no seat for me on the plane

缺點: We booked with Virgin however flew with Delta and we were not alerted to this. We booked with Virgin for a reason. They also did not have seats for me when I went to check in on both flights and I had to negotiate seats before boarding. Very disappointing.

11月7日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
31小時30分鐘
11月12日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
33小時50分鐘
NT$ 18,742
旅程:6天
6.6顯示評論
整體6.6 好
根據6,492篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
XIY
HKG
6.0

優點: It flew

缺點: Flight departure time was wrong in Kayak and flight stood at Xi'an airport for 40 mins + arrived at the satellite terminal in HK which meant a bus. Long wait for bags too

HKG
XIY
極好 10.0

缺點: 沒有

FCO
PVG
極好 9.3

優點: New planes. Spotlessly clean. Hard working helpful staff. Good boarding. Adequate legroom by modern standards. Food typical of economy these days. OK. But really good staff.

缺點: Fried rice breakfast out of Rome. Mushy. But overall food out of Sydney, Rome and Shanghai, fine.

XIY
HKG
7.6

優點: The price and availability was a plus. Food and drinks was too. No personal entertainment....short flight anyways. If leaving or arriving from HKG, you will be taking the shuttle on the Tarmack, so you maybe out in the weather for a few. Clean and friendly. Would fly again.

缺點: They rescheduled my return flight a few hours earlier, but offered no compensation....also it was about 30 minutes late. So what was the point in making the flight earlier?

SYD
PVG
6.3

優點: Don’t expect to be treated too well, it’s no bad but let’s face it Chinese service customer is just okay

缺點: There was only one meal, not very special.

4月15日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
9小時20分鐘
4月19日 週日
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
10小時35分鐘
NT$ 17,490
旅程:5天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
AKL
BNE
極好 8.6

優點: Good entertainment choice

缺點: Average economy plane food

TPE
NRT
極好 10.0

優點: ,很舒適餐點很棒服務很好

缺點: 希望班機準時開行

HKG
CGK
一般 3.6

缺點: 飞机check in always late,机上根本连一人一部电視机都沒有,更何況别希望要看任何电影,食物差。 Tinawaty

KUL
TPE
6.0

缺點: 雞肉餐雖然肉不多,飯很多,但是有些飯粒生硬不熟。

SYD
TPE
一般 3.0

缺點: Everything was a joke to a West standard

11月21日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
17小時40分鐘
11月30日 週六
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
15小時05分鐘
NT$ 17,948
旅程:10天
7.3顯示評論
整體7.3 好
根據2,870篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
8.0
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
LHR
MNL
尚可 4.6

優點: Birding was great. Punctual flight.

缺點: My entertainment screen broke. It took the crew 7 hours to replace it. A crew member said they would sort it, bit nothing for 6.5 hours There appeared be confusing within the crew members about what food I ordered.

BNE
MNL
極好 8.0

優點: Food was mostly very nice.

缺點: The Manila transfer process was a waste of time. Why when only transferring through at the airport you must go to an insecure area to get a Manila stamp in your passport and then have to go back into the secure area via another security check.

MNL
SYD
極好 9.6

優點: Very happy the crew was good all in all a good flight and great value for money.

MNL
AKL
極好 8.0

優點: Again lovely food and crew. Same good seats as the A350 from LHR.

缺點: Boarded and ready on time but 1hr delay for ATC reasons . The A330's a bit short of toilets requiring a 'queueing system' at busy times. Probably not the actual airline's fault but the ground handlers at AKL took an hour to produce my bags meaning me missing a connecting internal flight.

MNL
KUL
極好 8.6

優點: The ipad loaded with movies and magazines

缺點: The food needs improvement

2月12日 週三
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
15小時05分鐘
2月17日 週一
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
17小時00分鐘
NT$ 20,054
旅程:6天
7.9顯示評論
整體7.9 好
根據26,935篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
7.8
食品
7.5
PHX
JFK
尚可 5.0

優點: The crew were good.

缺點: The flight was delayed taking off. The crew tried to make it up but it was 90 minutes late in the end - I almost missed a connection. Seats were ok.

JFK
AUS
一般 2.0

缺點: 4 hour delay on take-off and despite that my luggage didn't make it onto the flight.

JFK
DUB
7.6

優點: The crew were fantastic. Departed on time, arrived 40 minutes early.

缺點: Delta One is a bit jaded on this flight.

ATL
AMS
6.3

優點: Food was decent and crew were nice enough

缺點: Seat space was small and cramped. Entertainment was poor unfortunately

ATL
FLL
7.6

缺點: Had to collect & re check luggage between flights. Couldn't they have been transferred to the next aircraft?

11月7日 週四
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
31小時30分鐘
11月12日 週二
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
33小時50分鐘
NT$ 18,742
旅程:6天
6.6顯示評論
整體6.6 好
根據6,492篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
PVG
JFK
6.3

優點: Managed to get a seat in a good spot which more legs soace

缺點: Chinese regulation forbid the use of any cell phone during the entire flight... even in flight mode!!! This is utterly frustrating and annoying, especially when the flight is 15 hours long!!! Also food was meat only, no possibility to get fish or vegetarian

JFK
PVG
尚可 5.6

優點: Staff very friendly

缺點: Choice of food. Very limited for business class. Movie selection very limited also.

SYD
PVG
7.3

優點: Plane was good (Economy class)

缺點: Food

HKG
PVG
6.0

優點: Good price, nice staff

缺點: It's always the same food and just one served beef rice! It would be nice if they could vary the food menu.

WUX
CTU
尚可 4.0

缺點: 無限延遲登機時間,需要改進...

11月10日 週日
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
8小時30分鐘
11月17日 週日
HNL
檀香山 Honolulu
TPE
台北 台灣桃園國際及其他機場
11小時10分鐘
NT$ 17,643
旅程:8天
8.0極好顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據54篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
TPE
SIN
極好 10.0

優點: Transit was smooth and efficient.

缺點: -

AKL
BNE
極好 8.6

優點: Good entertainment choice

缺點: Average economy plane food

AKL
BNE
極好 8.0

優點: The food and entertainment was excellent. Thr crew are friendly and luxurious plane comforts make it worth the trip paid for.

缺點: Not enough fresh air, breathing quality was poor before take off. We had fumes from jet gases leaking in through the air conditioning, but once the plane departed the quality improved.

TPE
LGW
7.0

優點: Phone charging, laptop socket, nice legroom and smart recline system means legroom gets better when the guy in front reclines. Toilets clean. New aircraft, attentive crew. AIRBUS A350 IS THE BEST!!!

缺點: Food okay could have been better. Entertainment system excellent but television shows section could have been better.

KIX
TPE
極好 8.3

優點: The boarding by zones is a great way to do it and they implemented it efficiently. The crew were outstanding - pleasant, smiley and courteous and made me feel welcomed. Meals were delicious.

缺點: A bit cramped and not quite enough toilets in economy class. Always a long queue for the toilet.

*
價格為包含所有稅項與費用的單人價,僅適用於電子票,而使用貨幣為TWD。

我們致力取得精確價格,但是沒辦法保證價格

原因如下:

我們不是賣家
KAYAK不設定價格,所以不能保證其他公司販賣的產品。

我們負責搜集眾多資料
我們的服務讓你迅速輕鬆同時比較數百家旅遊網站的搜尋結果,所以KAYAK是個搜尋引擎,無法保證找到的價格。

為什麼價格不能總是100%準確?
機位、飯店房間和租車的價格可能經常變動。同一時間內也可能有很多人同時嘗試購買相同的旅程選項。所以,有時候你可能會發現有些標價已經沒有位子了。

有更多疑問或者想跟我們舉報錯誤票價
請給我們寄送 電郵 我們團隊成員將很快跟你聯絡。

^
顯示票價包括經濟艙旅程的所有稅務和有關費用,是供應商在過去72小時內找到的價格。座位有限,不能保證所有航班和日期均有空位。費用可能根據航班和旅遊日期變動。某些航班會另外收取額外托運行李費用。詳情請查看航空公司網頁。
1
  • 來回
  • 單程
  • 多程
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
  • 多個艙等
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙