價格以新臺幣顯示。

搜尋台北市飛往英格蘭的便宜機票

搜尋台北市飛往英格蘭的便宜機票

來回
經濟艙
華盛頓 (WAS)
英格蘭
2月20日 週四
2月27日 週四
任何月份
比較KAYAK和 |
同時搜尋數百家旅遊網站,為你尋找飛往英格蘭的機票優惠

台北市往英格蘭航班資訊

航班降落地點 英格蘭
航班出發地點 台北市
機票價格 NT$ 17,304
航空公司 中國東方航空, 阿聯酋航空, 土耳其航空, 菲律賓航空, 新加坡航空, 韓亞航空, 廈門航空, 荷蘭皇家航空, 馬來西亞航空, 汶萊皇家航空, 卡達航空, 中華航空

預訂台北市飛往英格蘭機票的常見問題

KAYAK如何找到這麼便宜的機票價格?
KAYAK每年處理超過20億個旅遊搜尋,並顯示從數百個航空公司和第三方網站上所得的價格,讓你一次比較機票價格和選項。它同時亦顯示超過二百萬家飯店,還有租車、假期套票、活動等搜尋結果,以及數百萬個獲驗證的評價,讓用戶查看最多的旅遊選項。
KAYAK組合如何幫助我省錢?
KAYAK組合讓你結合不同航空公司的單程機票,因爲這樣比購買來回機票更便宜。
KAYAK所搜尋的機票供應商是否比同行競爭者多?
對,相比網上旅行社,KAYAK取得的數據和資訊較多,因此在全球各地的準確性亦較佳。
KAYAK的機票價格預測如何幫助我把握預訂的最佳時機?
KAYAK的機票價格預測工具使用歷史數據,以估計指定目的地和日期的價格會否在7天內有所改變,讓旅客知道應該立即預訂,還是等候一下。

預訂台北市往英格蘭的便宜機票(來回)

機場
出發地
台北
NT$ 17,304
僅選
NT$ 17,304
目的地
倫敦
NT$ 22,540
僅選
NT$ 22,540
NT$ 25,490
僅選
NT$ 25,490
NT$ 17,304
僅選
NT$ 17,304
NT$ 21,788
僅選
NT$ 21,788
5月22日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
19小時00分鐘
5月30日 週六
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
20小時35分鐘
NT$ 17,304
旅程:9天
6.7 顯示評論
整體6.7 好
根據6,661篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
PVG
CDG
7.3

優點: Plane was okay/good. Crew was good.

缺點: Food

KMG
HKG
尚可 4.6

優點: We departed on time, and boarding after we returned back to the airport the 2nd time was efficient.

缺點: The flight had to turn around halfway back - due to "mechanical issues". Arrived home 4 hours late. English language ability of the crew is appalling. They generally don't speak any other than what is in their crew manual...

PVG
HKG
尚可 5.3

優點: nice service

缺點: all passengers of economy almost boarded but we had to wait for a minibus to take us to the plane, this is ridiculous

SYD
CFS
極好 10.0

優點: Clean, comfortable and ahead ov time

缺點: Nothing

KIX
PVG
尚可 4.3

優點: No personal entertainment devices - you can't use your phone to read a book or listen to music. back to good old fashion travelling. Make sure you prepare yourself with a book and junk food to cope

3月11日 週三
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
STN
倫敦 斯坦斯特德機場
20小時25分鐘
3月18日 週三
STN
倫敦 斯坦斯特德機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
17小時45分鐘
NT$ 21,788
旅程:8天
8.3極好 顯示評論
整體8.3 極好
根據15,150篇評論
整體
8.3
登機
8.3
舒適
8.2
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.1
DXB
MNL
極好 10.0

優點: I like overall, food , entertainment, cleanliness and the amazing crew.

缺點: I would fly again with emirates.

DXB
KUL
6.6

優點: The food was nice.

缺點: Emirates should consider stop selling the seat that is just located next to the laboratory. It’s simoly too close to the facility and I could not get good rest at all not to mention about the strange smell.

LGW
DXB
7.6

優點: Just such a smooth journey.

CDG
DXB
極好 9.6

優點: Excellent flights in all respects.

AMD
DXB
極好 10.0

優點: Easy transit. Plesant crew.

缺點: Not much to add for an economy flight!

2月20日 週四
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
19小時35分鐘
2月26日 週三
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
17小時00分鐘
NT$ 22,390
旅程:7天
8.0極好 顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據22,677篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
7.9
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.1
食品
8.0
JFK
IST
極好 10.0

優點: Excellent service. Very tasty food.

缺點: Too many voice announcements, interfering with the entertainments system.

BKK
IST
極好 10.0

優點: Great helpful staff, nice cabin layout with lots of space to sleep, excellent food, free internet, Live TV - what else could you ask for.

缺點: There was nothing really to dislike here.

LHR
IST
極好 10.0

優點: Comfortable for that sort of journey

缺點: N/a

IST
LHR
尚可 5.3

缺點: Bording the plane has no order passengers seated in the front border before the rear. I was in 32a to he worst seat on the plane

SOF
IST
極好 8.4

缺點: I would definitely have vegetarian food. 30% of population is vegetarian

8月1日 週六
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
24小時55分鐘
8月15日 週六
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
27小時10分鐘
NT$ 22,540
旅程:15天
7.5 顯示評論
整體7.5 好
根據3,033篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
7.9
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
MNL
SYD
尚可 4.6

缺點: The transfer in Manila was like nowhere else. After the security check we were sent outside where buses were driving to claim our checked-in luggage to take it for another check just to drop it one minute later. Anywhere in the world if you board a flight with a stop-over you see your luggage at the final destination, not the case if you fly trough Manila.

MNL
MEL
一般 2.0

優點: Getting off the flight.

缺點: More often than not, Philippine Airlines has been our airline of choice because we found their rates to be fair and flights direct and easy. Despite the fact that the PAL terminal was pretty poor, and the food on board was never really decent, we remained loyal to PAL for quite a few years. On our way back to Melbourne from Manila on June 17, Saturday, Colin, Hendrix and I were awaiting boarding at gate 10 for flight PR 209. Having flown with PAL from Melbourne to Manila (as well as with another airline from Manila to Manchester and back), we understood that the usual procedure was to allow passengers with infants to board first. Due to the lack of order (there were no clear queues in sight), Colin decided to ask 3 different PAL personnel if there was, indeed, a priority queue for people travelling with infants. ALL THREE PERSONNEL ASSURED US THAT THEY WERE NOT YET BOARDING AND THAT WE WOULD BE CALLED UPON PRIOR TO THEM LETTING ANYONE ELSE ON THE PLANE. 2 minutes later, a PAL personnel appears with signage that reads certain row numbers and begins to call out to ALL PASSENGERS FOR BOARDING. Colin swiftly rushes to the front (me and baby in tow) and demands an explanation as to why we were told one thing but are watching them act upon something completely different. I wish I was joking when I tell you that the personnel just stared blankly at us and then carried on checking boarding passes. No apologies, no explanation offered. As soon as we boarded, Colin turned to the first flight steward he saw and asked for a complaint form and told this could ONLY be done online, to which Colin requested we be given the email/web address upon take off. The seats assigned to us were on the right most side of the aircraft, a window and a middle seat. As Colin was placing our bags in the overhead compartment, the steward called to Colin from across the aisle (past the 3 seats in the middle of the plane) to introduce the purser, Jolly Bello. Please note this was happening while people were also trying to get past and get to their seats -and Mr. bello called out across the aisle, "I heard you have a complaint??" to which Colin, baffled, replied "yes do you want to come over here so we aren’t shouting over these people?". Colin yet again told this purser what the complaint was about and was asked (verbatim) "so would you like to make a complaint against THEM?" Would the correct protocol not be to 1. Apologise for any confusion, miscommunication or poor service, 2. Take some responsibility and acknowledge the complaint and 3. Maybe come approach us AFTER TAKE OFF and not while everyone is trying to board the plane? We are no longer choosing Philippine Airlines.

SYD
MNL
極好 8.0

優點: Crew are very helpful.

缺點: Need reclining seats

LHR
MNL
7.0

缺點: Seats did not recline very much. Hard. Food was very plain and starchy.

LHR
MNL
極好 8.0

優點: On time, very good service, good food & wine and very comfortable. Plenty of space around the business class seat and easy access to and from seat. Large screen tv.

缺點: Slightly limited entertainment . Mabuhay lounge at Manila's average.

8月3日 週一
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
28小時55分鐘
8月19日 週三
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
24小時15分鐘
NT$ 23,233
旅程:17天
8.7極好 顯示評論
整體8.7 極好
根據3,839篇評論
整體
8.7
登機
8.9
舒適
8.5
機艙服務員
9.0
娛樂
8.7
食品
8.4
SYD
SIN
極好 8.3

優點: Crew very attentive but not intrusive. Food very good.

缺點: I did not find much to watch on entertainment system. Have to get crew to assemble flat bed, a bit of a nuisance. Also to turn it back into a chair.

SIN
FRA
極好 8.4

優點: Despite being a very late flight at 11 pm, the crew was courteous but not over the top, when all the passengers wanted to catch some sleep

缺點: Lufthansa's short haul slim line seats become uncomfortable after 1.5 hours

SIN
ADL
極好 8.0

缺點: Food

CDG
SIN
極好 9.6

缺點: Security screening very slow

SIN
BNE
極好 8.3

優點: Crew were helpful and attended to any needs that we requested. As I am a big person the seat is never that comfortable but Singapore Airlines seating is more spacious than other companies I have flown with.

缺點: The food was not too attractive, better variety of main meals

2月22日 週六
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
36小時20分鐘
2月29日 週六
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
31小時20分鐘
NT$ 23,353
旅程:8天
8.4極好 顯示評論
整體8.4 極好
根據4,229篇評論
登機
8.4
舒適
8.2
機艙服務員
8.7
娛樂
8.0
食品
8.1
ICN
SYD
極好 8.0

優點: The configuration of two seats on the sides convenient when flying with a partner.

缺點: Service effecient but lack warmth. Food choice limited, no vegeterian option .

SIN
ICN
7.2

優點: On time, smooth landing.

缺點: Food was so-so, a little too salty.

SYD
ICN
6.0

優點: A380

ICN
SIN
極好 8.3

優點: As expected, the crews' service were good. Comfortable seats and nice meals.

缺點: On the way back to Singapore, there was no entertainment in each seat. Didn't expect this and never experience from my previous flight with Asiana. There was the main screen in the centre but I can't choose and the lights were on all the way when I tried to sleep. Disappointed that they didn't inform in advance. People expect Asiana as same as SQ which provides full of new equipment such as personal screen on each seat.

HNL
ICN
6.0

缺點: i understand that is a Korean airlines, but you are flying in international route, please prepare some English material,such as if you don't let people use our own pillow, the explanation material cannot be in Korean Only.

5月19日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
28小時25分鐘
5月25日 週一
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
29小時15分鐘
NT$ 24,797
旅程:7天
7.1 顯示評論
整體7.1 好
根據582篇評論
整體
7.1
登機
7.2
舒適
7.1
機艙服務員
7.6
娛樂
6.7
食品
6.9
FOC
PEK
一般 2.0

缺點: Late taking off. Sat 30 minutes at Beijing airport waiting to park, then waited 15 minutes for a bus transfer to the terminal build. Only one bus so deplaned at the speed of the slowest passenger. 10 min bus journey to the terminal building. Missed my flight to the UK. I recommend you use an airline that pays for an air bridge and can coordinate the ground staff to be ready for the planes arrival!

SIN
XMN
7.3

優點: The number of take offs equaled the number of landings :)

SZX
SEA
一般 2.0

優點: Nothing

缺點: The fact that I was not able to get on my flight because I didn't have a visa after I called the airline over a week before my flight to ask about it and they told me I didn't need one. They told me I would get a temporary 72 visa upon arrival in Fuzhou but when I went to check in this was not the case. Now they won't give me any money back for that flight or the one I had to buy to get home. It was their fault I was not on the flight and they won't own up to it. I will never fly with them and I will do my best to let others know that they shouldn't either

SIN
XMN
一般 2.0

優點: Nil

缺點: My keychain was ripped off from my baggage despite me hiding it. It was stolen by their baggage handler and the airline refused to admit liability and was protecting it Staff. Xiamenair is a corrupted airline which I will not take in the future!

HGH
HKG
尚可 4.0

缺點: Hope to keep departure on time !!!!!!

6月10日 週三
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LCY
倫敦市機場
24小時25分鐘
6月20日 週六
LCY
倫敦市機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
23小時20分鐘
NT$ 25,490
旅程:11天
8.0極好 顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據3,545篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
8.0
舒適
7.7
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
7.2
食品
7.5
MAN
AMS
6.8

缺點: The check in desk was late opening & the carry on luggage size was smaller than advertised on their website, so it had to be put in the hold. Open on time to prevent less stress to travelers & give more accurate information about cabin luggage.

MAN
AMS
6.0

優點: Friendly crew, upgraded seat was worthwhile

缺點: More snacks in between meals,

GLA
AMS
極好 10.0

優點: The crew were very nice, food was tasty, seat comfortable and the entertainment great as well. Will be flying KLM again soon :)

YVR
AMS
6.8

優點: Crew was helpful and food was very good

缺點: There was no entertainment on the flight from Vancouver to Amsterdam and this on top of a two hour delay in taking off which led us to have to literally run to our gate in Amsterdam to make the connection to Mumbai

AMS
BUD
極好 9.6

優點: Our flight was delayed in Bejing, than we loosed the booked flight of KLM. When we arrived in Amsterdam, we get the recheked in flight.

缺點: Doesn't

7月20日 週一
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
21小時45分鐘
8月5日 週三
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
20小時10分鐘
NT$ 27,055
旅程:17天
7.2 顯示評論
整體7.2 好
根據1,513篇評論
整體
7.2
登機
7.3
舒適
7.2
機艙服務員
7.6
娛樂
6.9
食品
6.7
KUL
SYD
尚可 5.6

優點: Having 2 seats to ourselves

缺點: Crew hurried;seats cramped;boarding a pin-had to take watches off;food indifferent;sat on Sydney tarmac nearly 1/2 hr

KUL
PER
尚可 5.6

優點: Different seat location for family of five Missing luggage

LHR
KUL
極好 9.3

優點: The crew was very attentive. The pilot landed the plane smoothly. Although had a delayed departure from KUL, we arrived in Sydney earlier than expected.

KUL
KCH
極好 10.0

優點: Smooth flight, great entertainment

PER
BKI
7.6

優點: Direct flight

缺點: Bigger aircraft

7月20日 週一
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
22小時35分鐘
8月7日 週五
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
34小時45分鐘
NT$ 27,325
旅程:19天
8.3極好 顯示評論
整體8.3 極好
根據143篇評論
登機
8.3
舒適
8.0
機艙服務員
8.8
娛樂
7.8
食品
7.7
BWN
MNL
7.0

優點: Super crew. Boarding full plane very efficient. Airbus A320 inadequte to serve great meal to full plane. Gangway too narrow. Big struggle for cabin crew. Captain message hrd to hear. On time. Good landing. Entertainment bad flip down screens not good enough.

缺點: See above. Aircraft not ok for busy sector. Eg A330 required

MEL
BWN
極好 8.6

優點: Very clean aircraft, very good service from friendly, helpful crew, entertainment system is very good.

缺點: Didn't like the hot meal much. Preferred that crew gave extra water during meals even without asking. Fruits should have been offered, too.

BWN
HKG
極好 10.0

優點: Gave me aisle seat, great service

BKK
BWN
極好 10.0

優點: Their Dreamliner plane is spacious, well fitted, not cramped.

缺點: Unable to listen to movies with their headphones - too much static

DXB
BWN
7.6

優點: Same as outbound flight.

缺點: Same as outbound flight.

2月22日 週六
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
42小時40分鐘
2月29日 週六
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
36小時05分鐘
NT$ 28,228
旅程:8天
8.4極好 顯示評論
整體8.4 極好
根據10,683篇評論
整體
8.4
登機
8.4
舒適
8.2
機艙服務員
8.7
娛樂
8.3
食品
8.0
PRG
DOH
極好 10.0

優點: 服務員真的很好,餐點也好吃,娛樂螢幕也很大,最讓我驚訝的是,搭乘中東的航空公司,遇到會講中文的空姐,真的非常的加分,而且空間很漂亮也很親切,會想要再搭乘。

缺點: 娛樂系統中文顯示有問題,有時候中文會被拆散,完全看不出是什麼字。

DUB
DOH
極好 8.3

缺點: Not a lot other than better choice of movies and music. Super airline as always

LHR
DOH
6.6

優點: The crew, Venyat looking after my aisle was exemplary. He kept note of when I was asleep when the service passed through. Whenever I go to the galley, he would notice and asked if I needed anything. And this is in Economy!

缺點: On the A350, the seat doesn't recline much. It was quite uncomfortable.

FCO
DOH
極好 10.0

優點: Excellent-18 hour flight but Qatar really looks after you. Crew amazing and food is pretty good.

DOH
NBO
7.0

優點: The attendants were great.

缺點: The food on all 4 flights was ok. Could have been more interesting recipes and dessert. The seats on all flights were consistently hard and stiff. It was impossible to get a decent rest because of that as well as the areas being pretty cramped.

2月22日 週六
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
13小時55分鐘
3月4日 週三
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
13小時15分鐘
NT$ 29,673
旅程:12天
8.1極好 顯示評論
整體8.1 極好
根據7篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.1
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.0
食品
7.6
SYD
TPE
極好 8.0

缺點: Nothing

TPE
KUL
6.3

優點: 服務很好

缺點: 沒有個人娛樂系統 近五小時航程很難捱

TPE
OKA
極好 10.0

優點: Comfortable and relaxing!

缺點: -

SYD
TPE
極好 8.3

優點: Got an exit row seat. Lots of leg room.

缺點: No complaints.

HKG
CGK
一般 3.6

缺點: 飞机check in always late,机上根本连一人一部电視机都沒有,更何況别希望要看任何电影,食物差。 Tinawaty

5月22日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
19小時00分鐘
5月30日 週六
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
20小時35分鐘
NT$ 17,304
旅程:9天
6.7 顯示評論
整體6.7 好
根據6,661篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
PVG
DEL
一般 2.0

優點: It was cheap but I would not do it again

缺點: I made friends with another passenger who when texting his number introduced himself as ‘XYZ, flight from hell’. That pretty much sums it up but here’s a laundry list of issues I faced on the trip 1. They landed us in a different airport in China and did not inform us on how to get to the other airport (PVG). After several failed attempts of catching a taxi that accepts Visa or US dollars, we finally got a bus that ferried us 2. They also did not automatically transfer the luggage, so I had to carry my two checked in bags to the other one and then stand in a 45 min queue to get them checked in again 3. Unhelpful ground staff 4. Delayed second flight. After a shitty eight hour long layover, we got another 2 5. Horrible food 6. No ear plugs are available in the plane 7. Not a single apology from the crew about the delay Also, anyone who doesn’t speak mandarin needs to understand that the crew in China is not well equipped to understand and help you, so be prepared to have the translation struggle

LST
MEL
極好 8.6

優點: Personal, comfortable, easy

缺點: The breakfast pack was ok but the scroll thingy was dry and not very nice!

FCO
PVG
極好 9.3

優點: New planes. Spotlessly clean. Hard working helpful staff. Good boarding. Adequate legroom by modern standards. Food typical of economy these days. OK. But really good staff.

缺點: Fried rice breakfast out of Rome. Mushy. But overall food out of Sydney, Rome and Shanghai, fine.

LGW
PVG
尚可 5.6

優點: Left on time.

缺點: Food very unappetising. Poor movie selection

SYD
CFS
極好 10.0

優點: Clean, comfortable and ahead ov time

缺點: Nothing

5月8日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
20小時25分鐘
5月21日 週四
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
22小時10分鐘
NT$ 17,936
旅程:14天
6.7 顯示評論
整體6.7 好
根據6,661篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
BKK
PVG
7.3

優點: Short layover, very good price.

缺點: Very obvious the crew (at least in my section) have a problem with Non- Chinese people. Their attitude changed to others as well as me when they are asked for something. Very noticeable!!!!!!

PVG
SIN
尚可 4.6

優點: Friendly staff

缺點: Very disappointed with seat, choice of movies and food was not edible. Very poor when compared to business class on other airlines.

MNL
PVG
7.3

優點: Delay ex Manila was said to be 3 hours but was shortened. Looking at bright side.

缺點: The reception in Shanghai did not at first permit me to connect on my flight to Rome. If I missed that I have a flight on Monday 11am to Geneva that I would miss. My shortened layover in Shanghai due to Manila delay was still 45 minutes but Inwas being asked to transfer and get another flight through the transfer desk. Luckily After a few minutes in line at the transfer desk, was allowed back on my original flight. However and unfortunately, it was due to another 2 hour delay. arrived Rome 815++ pm ISO 6pm.

PVG
LHR
尚可 4.0

缺點: So hot on the plane and cramped.

XIY
HKG
6.0

優點: It flew

缺點: Flight departure time was wrong in Kayak and flight stood at Xi'an airport for 40 mins + arrived at the satellite terminal in HK which meant a bus. Long wait for bags too

5月8日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
20小時25分鐘
5月21日 週四
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
22小時10分鐘
NT$ 17,936
旅程:14天
6.7 顯示評論
整體6.7 好
根據6,661篇評論
整體
6.7
登機
6.7
舒適
6.6
機艙服務員
7.0
娛樂
6.3
食品
6.1
PVG
CEB
極好 10.0

優點: same as before Staff excellent and nice with everybody

缺點: the foods

PVG
SIN
尚可 4.6

優點: Friendly staff

缺點: Very disappointed with seat, choice of movies and food was not edible. Very poor when compared to business class on other airlines.

ICN
PVG
6.0

優點: Managed to get a seat in a good spot which more legs soace

缺點: Chinese regulation forbid the use of any cell phone during the entire flight... even in flight mode!!! This is utterly frustrating and annoying, especially when the flight is 15 hours long!!! Also food was meat only, no possibility to get fish or vegetarian

PVG
ORD
極好 10.0

優點: My dietary preferences didn't get reported right and the flight attendant was very accomodating and made me a platter of a bunch of sides whereas other airlines in my experiences just say tough luck.

缺點: I don't speak Chinese so I found their website very confusing and couldn't navigate my booking online well

PVG
JFK
6.3

優點: Managed to get a seat in a good spot which more legs soace

缺點: Chinese regulation forbid the use of any cell phone during the entire flight... even in flight mode!!! This is utterly frustrating and annoying, especially when the flight is 15 hours long!!! Also food was meat only, no possibility to get fish or vegetarian

3月11日 週三
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
STN
倫敦 斯坦斯特德機場
20小時25分鐘
3月18日 週三
STN
倫敦 斯坦斯特德機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
17小時45分鐘
NT$ 21,788
旅程:8天
8.3極好 顯示評論
整體8.3 極好
根據15,150篇評論
整體
8.3
登機
8.3
舒適
8.2
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.1
DXB
SIN
極好 8.0

缺點: Availability of livesport tv channels

DXB
LHR
6.0

缺點: Just because I have bought my ticket on points I was not given a chauffeur driver.

JNB
DXB
尚可 4.0

缺點: Food on the menu was not available. Some of us did not get lunch and were being offered bread. Some flight attendants were impatient with pax and unwilling to help especially with regards to Wifi on board , others were impolite

STN
DXB
極好 8.6

優點: Seat was fine for size of plane and comfortable for a night flight. Food was flavoursome and nice.

缺點: Had a problem with the two socket headphone Jack as it was not seating correctly so only got sound out of one ear mostly

SIN
DXB
一般 2.0

缺點: why did they take my blanket and headphones 1 hour before we land?

2月20日 週四
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
19小時35分鐘
2月26日 週三
LGW
倫敦 蓋特威克機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
17小時00分鐘
NT$ 22,390
旅程:7天
8.0極好 顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據22,677篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
7.9
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.1
食品
8.0
IST
TUN
極好 8.3

缺點: Excellent service by good mood personal and cabine crew. I enjoyed the short flight.

KTM
IST
6.0

優點: Entertainment and food are always reliably good on Turkish.

缺點: Ground crew was very poor at communication, no one warned us we would need a visa; we spent hours and hours queuing for what could have been sorted out in advance. Communication was terrible. The flight was delayed due to Pakistan closing air space. Turkish rescheduled but no real help in Istanbul.

CPT
IST
極好 8.0

優點: Good gluten free bread on Istanbul to Malta leg. Blankets are good as is amenity pack which has all but diasappeared on BA. Good choice of films

缺點: Foot rest in economy, gluten free meal is poor (except bread).

OSL
IST
一般 2.0

缺點: Flight was delayed - missed connection in Istanbul

IST
KBP
極好 9.3

優點: left on the, arrived on time, crew were friendly and efficient, seat was comfortable

缺點: Food was a bit basic and in-flight entertainment was a bit limited, but on a 2 hour flight not a major problem

8月1日 週六
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
24小時55分鐘
8月15日 週六
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
27小時10分鐘
NT$ 22,540
旅程:15天
7.5 顯示評論
整體7.5 好
根據3,033篇評論
整體
7.5
登機
7.4
舒適
7.3
機艙服務員
7.9
娛樂
6.9
食品
7.1
MNL
LHR
極好 9.6

優點: I was very lucky to have two spaces beside me so plenty of room however I know this is not always the case. This plaine was modern with a good selection of inflight entertainment. The on board staff were extreamly courteous and helpful. Food was okay was a good selection of beverages on this flight. You are provided with inlight comforts like blackets etc if you wished to sleep -

缺點: No complaints on this flight

MNL
HKG
6.0

缺點: The lounge is awful.

MNL
LHR
極好 9.0

優點: Staff attended well , flight on time, well organised

缺點: N/A

MNL
MEL
一般 2.0

優點: Getting off the flight.

缺點: More often than not, Philippine Airlines has been our airline of choice because we found their rates to be fair and flights direct and easy. Despite the fact that the PAL terminal was pretty poor, and the food on board was never really decent, we remained loyal to PAL for quite a few years. On our way back to Melbourne from Manila on June 17, Saturday, Colin, Hendrix and I were awaiting boarding at gate 10 for flight PR 209. Having flown with PAL from Melbourne to Manila (as well as with another airline from Manila to Manchester and back), we understood that the usual procedure was to allow passengers with infants to board first. Due to the lack of order (there were no clear queues in sight), Colin decided to ask 3 different PAL personnel if there was, indeed, a priority queue for people travelling with infants. ALL THREE PERSONNEL ASSURED US THAT THEY WERE NOT YET BOARDING AND THAT WE WOULD BE CALLED UPON PRIOR TO THEM LETTING ANYONE ELSE ON THE PLANE. 2 minutes later, a PAL personnel appears with signage that reads certain row numbers and begins to call out to ALL PASSENGERS FOR BOARDING. Colin swiftly rushes to the front (me and baby in tow) and demands an explanation as to why we were told one thing but are watching them act upon something completely different. I wish I was joking when I tell you that the personnel just stared blankly at us and then carried on checking boarding passes. No apologies, no explanation offered. As soon as we boarded, Colin turned to the first flight steward he saw and asked for a complaint form and told this could ONLY be done online, to which Colin requested we be given the email/web address upon take off. The seats assigned to us were on the right most side of the aircraft, a window and a middle seat. As Colin was placing our bags in the overhead compartment, the steward called to Colin from across the aisle (past the 3 seats in the middle of the plane) to introduce the purser, Jolly Bello. Please note this was happening while people were also trying to get past and get to their seats -and Mr. bello called out across the aisle, "I heard you have a complaint??" to which Colin, baffled, replied "yes do you want to come over here so we aren’t shouting over these people?". Colin yet again told this purser what the complaint was about and was asked (verbatim) "so would you like to make a complaint against THEM?" Would the correct protocol not be to 1. Apologise for any confusion, miscommunication or poor service, 2. Take some responsibility and acknowledge the complaint and 3. Maybe come approach us AFTER TAKE OFF and not while everyone is trying to board the plane? We are no longer choosing Philippine Airlines.

PVG
MNL
尚可 5.6

缺點: Delayed for 2.5 hours.

8月3日 週一
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
28小時55分鐘
8月19日 週三
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
24小時15分鐘
NT$ 23,233
旅程:17天
8.7極好 顯示評論
整體8.7 極好
根據3,839篇評論
整體
8.7
登機
8.9
舒適
8.5
機艙服務員
9.0
娛樂
8.7
食品
8.4
SYD
SIN
極好 8.3

優點: Crew very attentive but not intrusive. Food very good.

缺點: I did not find much to watch on entertainment system. Have to get crew to assemble flat bed, a bit of a nuisance. Also to turn it back into a chair.

SIN
FRA
極好 8.4

優點: Despite being a very late flight at 11 pm, the crew was courteous but not over the top, when all the passengers wanted to catch some sleep

缺點: Lufthansa's short haul slim line seats become uncomfortable after 1.5 hours

SIN
HKG
極好 8.0

優點: Efficiency, good.

AMD
SIN
6.0

優點: one of the crew was rude. my spouse forgot to fold-up the cup holder, the hostess heat the holder so hard while walking. I don't know but it appeared as very very rude.

缺點: Improve the process for boarding people were standing there for 45 minutes to 1 hour. People there needs training

SIN
MNL
6.0

缺點: crew isnt very careful in serving the food but its not really that bad. but im just comparing it from my previous flights so i think that group of FA's can do better. And the food was served a bit a late so they dont have time to serve hot beverage anymore.

2月22日 週六
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
36小時20分鐘
2月29日 週六
LHR
倫敦 希思路機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
31小時20分鐘
NT$ 23,353
旅程:8天
8.4極好 顯示評論
整體8.4 極好
根據4,229篇評論
登機
8.4
舒適
8.2
機艙服務員
8.7
娛樂
8.0
食品
8.1
ICN
SIN
一般 2.6

優點: Didn’t like any part of the flight.

缺點: The cabin was way too hot for comfort. The food wasn’t good. Little entertainment options.

CTS
ICN
一般 3.3

缺點: Plane was far too old. No in-flight entertainment. food mediocre. no battery charger USB plug

SYD
ICN
極好 8.0

優點: 다른 항공사 비행기에 비해 좌석이 넓은편임. USB 포트는 기본에 콘센트까지 있어서 놀람. 엔터테이먼트는 주로 한국 방송들 위주였던듯.

缺點: 아시아나 기내식 괜찮다고 들어 기대했으나 싱가폴항공보다 별로였음. 비빔밥에 단무지2개 계란말이 한조각.. 싱가폴항공은 비빔밥에 김치도 주는데.. 그리고 밥 다먹고 빵 먹는다고 식기 걷을때 나이프랑 컵을 못 냈는데 다시 가지러 안옴..-_-;; 캔이랑 컵이랑 다 가지고 있었는데 다시 수거하러 와야하는거 아닌가..?

ICN
SIN
極好 8.3

優點: As expected, the crews' service were good. Comfortable seats and nice meals.

缺點: On the way back to Singapore, there was no entertainment in each seat. Didn't expect this and never experience from my previous flight with Asiana. There was the main screen in the centre but I can't choose and the lights were on all the way when I tried to sleep. Disappointed that they didn't inform in advance. People expect Asiana as same as SQ which provides full of new equipment such as personal screen on each seat.

ICN
SYD
極好 8.0

優點: The configuration of two seats on the sides convenient when flying with a partner.

缺點: Service effecient but lack warmth. Food choice limited, no vegeterian option .

*
價格為包含所有稅項與費用的單人價,僅適用於電子票,而使用貨幣為TWD。

我們致力取得精確價格,但是沒辦法保證價格

原因如下:

我們不是賣家
KAYAK不設定價格,所以不能保證其他公司販賣的產品。

我們負責搜集眾多資料
我們的服務讓你迅速輕鬆同時比較數百家旅遊網站的搜尋結果,所以KAYAK是個搜尋引擎,無法保證找到的價格。

為什麼價格不能總是100%準確?
機位、飯店房間和租車的價格可能經常變動。同一時間內也可能有很多人同時嘗試購買相同的旅程選項。所以,有時候你可能會發現有些標價已經沒有位子了。

有更多疑問或者想跟我們舉報錯誤票價
請給我們寄送 電郵 我們團隊成員將很快跟你聯絡。

-
1
  • 來回
  • 單程
  • 多程
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
  • 多個艙等
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙