價格以新臺幣顯示。

搜尋克里夫蘭飛往台灣的便宜機票

搜尋克里夫蘭飛往台灣的便宜機票

來回
經濟艙
克里夫蘭 (CLE)
台灣
6月3日 週三
6月10日 週三
任何月份
比較KAYAK和 |
同時搜尋數百家旅遊網站,為你尋找飛往台灣的機票優惠

有用資訊

淡季

9月 避開人潮的最佳時機,價格平均可下降4%

旺季

12月 最熱門的出行時段,價格平均可高2%

來回機票平均價格

NT$ 962 (過去兩週的平均價格)

來回機票優惠價格

NT$ 854 或以下

預訂克里夫蘭飛往台灣機票的常見問題

KAYAK的機票價格預測如何幫助我把握預訂的最佳時機?

預訂克里夫蘭往台灣的便宜機票(來回)

機場
出發地
克里夫蘭
NT$ 30,216
僅選
NT$ 30,216
目的地
台北
NT$ 30,216
僅選
NT$ 30,216
7月1日 週三
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
36小時00分鐘
8月18日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
48小時23分鐘
NT$ 30,216
旅程:49天
根據0篇評論
10月24日 週六
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
24小時05分鐘
10月30日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
26小時16分鐘
NT$ 31,951
旅程:7天
根據0篇評論
10月24日 週六
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
23小時23分鐘
10月30日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
20小時07分鐘
NT$ 33,058
旅程:7天
8.6極好 顯示評論
整體8.6 極好
根據2,827篇評論
整體
8.6
登機
8.6
舒適
8.3
機艙服務員
8.9
娛樂
8.5
食品
8.2
ROT
AKL
極好 10.0

優點: The staff was very helpful

缺點: None

LAX
AKL
7.6

缺點: Air NZ serves the special meals first but never offers passengers a drink. By the time the meal and drinks trolleys come round for the rest of passengers, most people have eaten their special meal.

AKL
PMR
6.6

優點: GREAT CREW, THEY DID THE BEST THEY COULD. VERY FRIENDLY AND HELPFUL.

缺點: Ground personnel could have been way more helpful. We came back from Europe and needed to take a domestic flight to Palmerston North.We had a lot of handluggage that was allowed in our international flight, we had purchased an extra suitcase ticket to make sure it wouldn't be a problem. The lady that helped us was not willing to include any more items than 1 small suitcase that weighed only 11 kg, but we had paid for 23 kg. When we wanted to board the airplane we were told we could only take 7 kg each. Which caused problems and stress that we couldn't use after a 40-hour flight from Europe. We discussed this with the lady at the counter which wasn't really helpful to start with, but eventually, she let us board the plane anyway after we had to explain our situation a few times, and after she asked us to weigh our extra items, which of course we're more than 7 kg. We were pleased that at least she let us board our plane in the end. Hopefully next time we won't encounter the same problems.

SIN
AKL
極好 10.0

優點: The crew is amazing. Always friendly, smiling and happy to oblige. Love the New Zealand hospitality. The inflight entertainment has so many programmes to watch, and the list of music options to listen in to is well stocked. Food is excellent. Obviously overate in the 9 1/2 hour flight.

BNE
AKL
極好 8.0

優點: Good seats great staff

缺點: Paying for movies not impressed

10月24日 週六
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
35小時50分鐘
10月30日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
37小時54分鐘
NT$ 33,896
旅程:7天
8.0極好 顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據22,848篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
7.9
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.1
食品
8.0
IST
SIN
極好 9.0

優點: Good food, excellent lounge in Istanbul and super comfy seats in the longer leg

缺點: Boarding crew did not have the required knowledge of visa process and made us wait 40 mins

HAV
CCS
尚可 5.6

優點: Great crew, confortable seats, free complimentary internet service

缺點: Even though the same plane was used, the Cuban authorities asked passengers bound to Caracas to deboard the plane, pass to transit, to have us waiting an hour to re board. Boarding was a complete chaos. We were not handed headsets, so could not listen to inflight entertainment. Food was not good

IST
CAI
極好 10.0

缺點: The best Airlines ever from every aspects, I’m frequent traveler of Turkish airlines and will be for good.

CAI
IST
6.0

優點: Leg room was OK

缺點: No alcohol service, cabin lights not dimmed seeing it was a late night flight.

IST
SFO
極好 9.0

優點: Great good entertainment n crew provided warm and courteous service

缺點: Terrible boarding process n the seats are not the best- not bad just not as good as everything else.

10月24日 週六
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
37小時15分鐘
10月30日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
30小時46分鐘
NT$ 33,956
旅程:7天
根據0篇評論
10月24日 週六
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
36小時45分鐘
10月30日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
33小時35分鐘
NT$ 33,985
旅程:7天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,926篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.8
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
SFO
ICN
極好 10.0

優點: Food,

缺點: Nothing

AKL
ICN
極好 8.3

優點: Very professional crew good service

缺點: Nothing really pilot couldn't understand him but does it really matter unless is an emergency

KUL
ICN
極好 10.0

優點: Service was immaculate, friendly staff, smooth flight, comfortable plane. Wonderful experience, would recommend it to everyone.

缺點: None

BOM
ICN
極好 10.0

優點: - Great Service by inflight crew. - Very good Indian veg meal options i.e. Hindu Veg Meal and Asian Veg Meal. I would suggest the non veg folks to try these next time.

ICN
HND
尚可 5.3

缺點: Again, my special meal request wasn't found and I ended up eating nothing

7月7日 週二
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
36小時00分鐘
7月21日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
36小時02分鐘
NT$ 34,315
旅程:15天
8.0極好 顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據22,848篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
7.9
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.1
食品
8.0
LHR
IST
極好 10.0

優點: Comfortable for that sort of journey

缺點: N/a

IST
LHR
6.0

優點: The plane was too hot

缺點: Plane too hot

BHX
IST
極好 8.0

優點: Good food, new movies and good leg space

缺點: Flight was delayed by an hour, luckily managed to make my connecting flight

IST
ATH
6.6

優點: We arrived in Athens eventually

缺點: People were made to wait outside in the cold airport bus for half an hour. The ground crew gave no explanation for the delay. After heavy protests, they let the waiting passengers back into the terminal. Supposedly the pilot was sick, but there was no communication at all from the airline about the cause of the delay or how long it would last.

IST
SIN
極好 9.0

優點: Good food, excellent lounge in Istanbul and super comfy seats in the longer leg

缺點: Boarding crew did not have the required knowledge of visa process and made us wait 40 mins

6月1日 週一
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
37小時40分鐘
6月30日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
36小時03分鐘
NT$ 35,152
旅程:30天
根據0篇評論
7月2日 週四
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
36小時00分鐘
8月3日 週一
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
36小時02分鐘
NT$ 35,182
旅程:33天
8.0極好 顯示評論
整體8.0 極好
根據22,848篇評論
整體
8.0
登機
7.9
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.3
娛樂
8.1
食品
8.0
IST
LHR
尚可 5.6

優點: I never usually like plane food but liked Turkish Airline meals on all flights I’ve been on so far

缺點: I do like turkish airlines but wasn’t happy with this flight. On check in we were left with seats towards the back of the aircraft. The lady seated neit to us in the aisle seat was in a wheel chair so was a problem if having to get in and out. I didn’t think it was fair that a person who depends on a wheel chair sits so far back on a plane. She also had to deal with our crying baby

IST
ORD
尚可 4.0

優點: I did not like anything from this trip. I just learned my lesson not to travel with turkish airlines ever again.

缺點: flight was canceled from previous flight so we had to overnight in istambul and the whole situation was handled very poorly nobody took the time to explain to me what to do and mind this I was traveling with three year old and I found myself crying at midnight at the airport not knowing what to do.

SAW
DLM
極好 8.3

優點: Vree

缺點: A little late

IST
OPO
極好 8.3

優點: The service was excellent, staff helpful and understanding.

缺點: No business class priority boarding, no assistance available with transfer.

IST
ATH
6.6

優點: We arrived in Athens eventually

缺點: People were made to wait outside in the cold airport bus for half an hour. The ground crew gave no explanation for the delay. After heavy protests, they let the waiting passengers back into the terminal. Supposedly the pilot was sick, but there was no communication at all from the airline about the cause of the delay or how long it would last.

7月2日 週四
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
39小時55分鐘
8月3日 週一
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
36小時02分鐘
NT$ 35,362
旅程:33天
根據0篇評論
7月2日 週四
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
31小時05分鐘
8月3日 週一
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
42小時03分鐘
NT$ 36,379
旅程:33天
根據0篇評論
7月7日 週二
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
24小時55分鐘
7月21日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
21小時42分鐘
NT$ 36,588
旅程:15天
根據0篇評論
7月2日 週四
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
26小時40分鐘
8月2日 週日
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
31小時23分鐘
NT$ 36,857
旅程:32天
根據0篇評論
10月24日 週六
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
32小時06分鐘
10月30日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
28小時40分鐘
NT$ 36,917
旅程:7天
8.1極好 顯示評論
整體8.1 極好
根據28,366篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.2
舒適
7.8
機艙服務員
8.5
娛樂
7.8
食品
7.5
DCA
JFK
極好 8.6

優點: extra legroom of comfort plus zone

缺點: Bordung process runs smoother now that the order is made clear ahead of time. In jfk they did not have the columns marked “comfort” “priority? “Main 3”, etc, like they had at Reagan arpoirt in DC

MSP
CVG
極好 10.0

缺點: No issues at all

AMS
SEA
7.0

優點: Good choice of movies but not all have subtitles, which comes in handy since phones are not really good. Food was great!

缺點: Seating pitch is just not acceptable for 10+ hrs long flight! I am tall (1.92 cm) but there are taller people than me and there is just no way they can sit in economy class seat! That is basically some kind of racism..

AMS
MUC
尚可 5.6

優點: Crew were nice. Flight itself was short. Was quick boarding considering how busy the flight was

缺點: Plane was very old. Seats were rigid and not very comfortable. No entertainment. Just basic really.

ATL
LAX
極好 8.0

缺點: A lot of turbulence

7月7日 週二
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
26小時30分鐘
7月21日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
28小時20分鐘
NT$ 38,473
旅程:15天
根據0篇評論
7月6日 週一
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
40小時14分鐘
7月21日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
40小時59分鐘
NT$ 39,101
旅程:16天
根據0篇評論
10月24日 週六
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
22小時45分鐘
10月30日 週五
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
47小時04分鐘
NT$ 40,836
旅程:7天
8.4極好 顯示評論
整體8.4 極好
根據4,256篇評論
登機
8.4
舒適
8.2
機艙服務員
8.7
娛樂
8.0
食品
8.1
OKA
ICN
極好 10.0

優點: Efficient check 8n process and great on board entertainment options.

ICN
SIN
一般 2.6

優點: Didn’t like any part of the flight.

缺點: The cabin was way too hot for comfort. The food wasn’t good. Little entertainment options.

FCO
ICN
6.3

優點: 한식 기내식이 좋음

缺點: 낡은 기체, 엔터테이먼트 종류가 다양하지 않음

ICN
SYD
極好 8.0

優點: The configuration of two seats on the sides convenient when flying with a partner.

缺點: Service effecient but lack warmth. Food choice limited, no vegeterian option .

LHR
ICN
極好 8.6

缺點: Transfer in Seoul could have been easier to understand

7月2日 週四
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
37小時26分鐘
8月3日 週一
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
21小時55分鐘
NT$ 41,106
旅程:33天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,926篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.8
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
KIX
ICN
極好 10.0

優點: From the April 12 Sydney to Seoul flight, the landing at Seoul was so smooth, so professionally done I hardly knew we had touched ground. That Captain has much to teach all pilots wanting a higher standard to their skills and the recognition of these standards. That caption is worth his/her weight in gold, giving Koran Air a gold standard. To compare, the landing at Osaka April 12, late at night, was done by an apprentice who has much to learn from your gold star captain..

缺點: The same Sydney to Seoul flight, crossed the Qld Great Barrier Reef around 11am April 12. Having a window seat, so much detail of the Reef was visible which greatly surprised me. Beautiful colours galore. Having my face glued to the window at this time, I was unaware of cabin happenings. A male steward tapped me on the shoulder and said "Close your window blind". The beautiful scene outside my window was a first and being 76 old, likely not to happen again for me. Naturally, I ask the male steward "Why", He repeated 4 more times, "Close your window blind". Each time my reply was the same, "Why". On his last request, his voice raised, so in turn, my reply was raised. Sadly, he walked away silently, hands waving in disgust. Only then did I realise the cabin was completely black, no light seen. If at 11am, traditionally, this is a custom, a service to passengers on that particular flight, the male steward didn't say. He clearly expected to be obeyed and didn't expect a challenge. But also felt I didn't deserve a reason for his, what clearly was a demand. Would he have treated a male passenger differently. I flew economy because that is what my budget demands. Flying is not common for me but certainly a thrill that demands a window seat. I give much praise to all other staff, especially the captain landing that very craft at Seoul. At my age, years of experience allows me to be aware and notice. A beautifully presented mature female stewardess in economy, served me. When I requested a beer with the main meal, she said I will give you my favourite. I knew this was double talk for having only one brand beer left, that was a weak American beer. I watched this lovely lady many times being distracted by other staff with questions and 2 other passengers near me, asking for changes. She never blew it. And she passed me in the Sydney terminal, end of the day for her and believe it or not, she remembered me. She was not in such a hurry to get to her destination, that she gave time by turning her body, giving me a wide smile with eyes saying, Yes, I served you. You see, she's never off the job of customer service. I learned much, flying with Korean Air. Many thanks, Sally

ATL
ICN
極好 8.0

優點: We liked the boarding in Atlanta and in Seoul with the people boarding by the numbers of their rows - boarded the back rows, then the middle then the front. Worked so much better than everyone rushing to get on! Flight attendants were very helpful with everything and always kind. Loved being able to sit in the exit row seats!!

缺點: Food was okay - we fly Korean Air whenever we travel to SE Asia and it seems the food is the same no matter what flight we are on. We like the pizza snack better than the bun with meat inside they served us on this trip.

PUS
HKG
極好 9.0

缺點: since it is the overnight flight, everyone was so tired but still serve food....... for the poeple who was sleeping, the smell was unpleasant.

PEK
ICN
極好 8.3

優點: I received a meal for a two leg flight of overall only 4.5 hours. The seating was nice and the food was very tasty. I love the layout of the Incheon Airport as well as the transfer experience.

ICN
SIN
7.3

優點: Aircraft is well kept and clean. Crew members are attentive and alert.check in process was fast and efficient.

缺點: Charging of excess baggage on second piece of luggage checkedin. Amount is too steep. Selection of movies could be expanded esp the korean selection since its korean air? Current selection of korean movies was only 5!

7月7日 週二
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
28小時18分鐘
7月21日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
21小時55分鐘
NT$ 41,644
旅程:15天
8.8極好 顯示評論
整體8.8 極好
根據4,926篇評論
整體
8.8
登機
8.8
舒適
8.6
機艙服務員
9.1
娛樂
8.6
食品
8.5
ICN
BNE
極好 9.0

優點: The crew were excellent.

缺點: I would have liked to have had a wider selection of movies. I would also have liked to have a hard copy menu to look at prior to meals, as unfortunately I couldn't always understand the crew, even though they were fantastic. With a little more detail I could have determined whether something was spicy or not.

ORD
ICN
極好 8.6

優點: I like that KE is lenient with the baggage allowance of 23kgs per piece that some can still go up to about 25kgs due to measurement system used (Metric vs. US). I also like that KE has bigger leg room even in the economy class.

缺點: I don't like the fact that KE charges the 3rd baggage (excess baggage) US$200 for only up to 23kgs. Anything beyond that is additional $100 for only up to 32kgs. another $100 beyond 32kgs. I will state for a fact that Cathay Pacific only charges US$150 for the 3rd baggage and is already up to 32kgs. Perhaps this is something KE would like to look into. In spite of Cathay Pacific's excess baggage rates, they have a smaller leg room in the economy class.

AKL
ICN
極好 10.0

缺點: Great value ,excellent and friendly service.

FUK
ICN
7.6

優點: Great service and a very friendly crew.

缺點: The food was ok, average and nothing special.

HKT
ICN
一般 2.6

優點: The 2nd flight plane was alright

缺點: Flight attendants have poor English and get upset if you ask for snacks or anything that makes them have to get supplies

7月1日 週三
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
40小時15分鐘
8月18日 週二
TPE
台北 臺灣桃園國際機場
CLE
克里夫蘭霍普金斯國際機場
20小時52分鐘
NT$ 42,213
旅程:49天
8.1極好 顯示評論
整體8.1 極好
根據4,743篇評論
整體
8.1
登機
8.1
舒適
7.9
機艙服務員
8.4
娛樂
7.3
食品
7.5
BKK
VIE
6.3

缺點: Austrian could learn from the likes of singapore airlines and cathay pacific: the choice of movies was pretty limited (1 italian, 1 french, 1 spanish) and the games were simply boring. The food was ok, breakfast pretty terrible (breed but no butter, reconstructiesergramingtheworstieverate.Stodwoowfs

VIE
HAV
極好 10.0

優點: Great flight. Was long but made nice by staff/crew and entertainment options.

VIE
TLV
7.3

優點: The flight attendants worked very hard Patient and courteous.

缺點: Drinks are varied Food needs improvement The bread is low The vegetarian meal is poor

VIE
BUD
極好 8.0

優點: On time & clean

缺點: Can’t really say

VIE
ZRH
一般 2.0

缺點: arogant staff, flight canceled, great difficulties to claim my money back

*
價格為包含所有稅項與費用的單人價,僅適用於電子票,而使用貨幣為TWD。

我們致力取得精確價格,但是沒辦法保證價格

原因如下:

我們不是賣家
KAYAK不設定價格,所以不能保證其他公司販賣的產品。

我們負責搜集眾多資料
我們的服務讓你迅速輕鬆同時比較數百家旅遊網站的搜尋結果,所以KAYAK是個搜尋引擎,無法保證找到的價格。

為什麼價格不能總是100%準確?
機位、飯店房間和租車的價格可能經常變動。同一時間內也可能有很多人同時嘗試購買相同的旅程選項。所以,有時候你可能會發現有些標價已經沒有位子了。

有更多疑問或者想跟我們舉報錯誤票價
請給我們寄送 電郵 我們團隊成員將很快跟你聯絡。

-
1
  • 來回
  • 單程
  • 多程
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
  • 多個艙等
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙
經濟艙
  • 經濟艙
  • 豪華經濟艙
  • 商務艙
  • 頭等艙